[rollei_list] 120/220 modification
- From: Masumi Yamamuro <surgeon24hrs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 09:17:59 -0500
I know I am kid of a lazy guy.When I shoot mediaum format, I prefere using 220
films. It is just becase I do not have to change rolls very often, especially
when I am using slide films with a lot of bracketings. I take a lot of street
photos. It is a little awkward to change rolls on the street frequently.My 2.8F
does not take 220 films. I found on Mr. Harry Fleenor's web site that he does
120/220 modification. www.rolleirepairs.com/220mod.html This sounds good for a
lazy guy like me.Has anybody had this modification? Any opinions about pros and
cons?Thanks, in advance, for help me deciding.
_________________________________________________________________
マイクロソフトの最新次世代ブラウザIE7にMSN版ならではの便利な機能をプラス
http://promotion.msn.co.jp/ie7/
- Follow-Ups:
- [rollei_list] Re: 120/220 modification
- From: Richard Sintchak
- [rollei_list] Re: 120/220 modification
- From: Marc James Small
- [rollei_list] Re: 120/220 modification
- From: Dennis Purdy
- [rollei_list] Re: 120/220 modification
- From: Mark Rabiner
- [rollei_list] Re: 120/220 modification
- From: Allen Zak
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] 120/220 modification
- » [rollei_list] Re: 120/220 modification
- » [rollei_list] Re: 120/220 modification
- » [rollei_list] Re: 120/220 modification
- » [rollei_list] Re: 120/220 modification
- » [rollei_list] Re: 120/220 modification
- » [rollei_list] Re: 120/220 modification
- » [rollei_list] Re: 120/220 modification
- » [rollei_list] Re: 120/220 modification
- » [rollei_list] Re: 120/220 modification
- » [rollei_list] Re: 120/220 modification
- [rollei_list] Re: 120/220 modification
- From: Richard Sintchak
- [rollei_list] Re: 120/220 modification
- From: Marc James Small
- [rollei_list] Re: 120/220 modification
- From: Dennis Purdy
- [rollei_list] Re: 120/220 modification
- From: Mark Rabiner
- [rollei_list] Re: 120/220 modification
- From: Allen Zak