[rodgersorgan] Quality of Consoles
- From: "Charlie Strack" <charlie_strack@xxxxxxx>
- To: <rodgersorgan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 15:17:38 -0700
Hi,
I have some direct experience with console build quality.
I bought a new Rodgers 770 in the mid 1980's. Certainly it is not =
indicative of current construction, I'm sure.
One of the side panels (plywood) began to split apart (delaminate) after a =
few months. This is not a very bad thing. I sold the instrument long =
before it became a problem, but (Noel asked for an example!) if it =
continued to delaminate (which seems unlikely) then truly the organ would =
have become unplayable because of structural damage.
How does Rodgers build consoles these days? I certainly don't know, but =
would like to. Anybody care to provide a description?
I've owned both Rodgers and Allens, and I currently have 3 analog Rodgers =
models. As far as analog organs go (and there aren't too many of us who =
have interest in analog organs these days) I always liked the sound of =
Rodgers better than any others. Their flute and diapasons are exceptional.=
=20
But I would readily transplant put my Rodgers circuits in an Allen console =
if I could find one. I've take apart some Allens, and believe me their =
level of construction quality is hard to beat.
Best regards,
Charlie who know the ear hears in analogue.
!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Find new MIDI music and Guides to Rodgers Organs at www.frogmusic.com
To post send messages to: rodgersorgan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change mail delivery (digest, vacation)
go to www.frogmusic.com/rodgersmem.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [rodgersorgan] Re: Quality of Consoles
- From: noel jones
Other related posts:
- » [rodgersorgan] Quality of Consoles
- » [rodgersorgan] Re: Quality of Consoles
- » [rodgersorgan] Re: Quality of Consoles
- » [rodgersorgan] Re: Quality of Consoles
- » [rodgersorgan] Re: Quality of Consoles
- [rodgersorgan] Re: Quality of Consoles
- From: noel jones