[rodgersorganusers] Analog
- From: noel jones <gedeckt@xxxxxxxx>
- To: rodgersorgan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:21:46 -0500
I am headed out the door for an 8 hour drive, so this discussion will be
interrupted a bit since I read 1and approve each message...
Anyhow, this is not meant to be controversial but I am going to say it.
Some people prefer analog organs because they sound electronic.
Since the Rodgers electronic organs, if they sound like pipes rather
than electronics, there are those that do not like them.
Before anyone gets crazy about this, let me tell you I had to voice a
digital for a Rodgers salesperson's recital and she was not happy until
it sounded electronic.
Not a dealer, bot a salesperson.
For those who prefer te analog sound, a Rodgers Digital CAN be voiced to
sound like an electronic.
But an analog will only sound like an analog. That is the major issue
about digitals...the possibilities, the freedom of the limitations due
to analog circuitry, expanse and maintenance.
noel
____________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or set to vacation,
go to www.frogmusic.com/rodgersmem.html
If you have any difficulty with this or PayPal,
please contact noeljones@xxxxxxxxxxxxx for help!
Shop for Playing Guides to your Rodgers Organ at Frog Music Press
- Follow-Ups:
- [rodgersorganusers] Re: Analog
- From: Ralph Cullen
- [rodgersorganusers] Re: Analog
- From: F Richard Burt
Other related posts:
- » [rodgersorganusers] Analog
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: Analog
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: Analog
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: Analog
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: Analog
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: Analog
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: Analog
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: Analog
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: Analog
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: Analog
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: Analog
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: Analog
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: Analog
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: Analog
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: Analog
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: Analog
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: Analog
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: Analog
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: Analog
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: Analog
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: Analog
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: Analog
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: Analog
- [rodgersorganusers] Re: Analog
- From: Ralph Cullen
- [rodgersorganusers] Re: Analog
- From: F Richard Burt