[rodgersorganusers] Re: A Thought About 'Pleasing Folks'
- From: "Charlie Strack" <charlie_strack@xxxxxxx>
- To: <rodgersorgan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:39:39 -0800
Keith Stiles:
I said nothing about stifling creative urges nor about playing the same =
hymns over and over, but here is what I think about these things.
If an organist doesn't have creative urges then he really is not an =
organist, just a player. If he has them but does not use them, then he is =
no musician and is not giving all that is asked of him. Without a musical =
approach our playing neither honors God nor helps others to do so--at best =
it is mechanical and thus uninspired. We are to bring our best to God, and =
this includes the grace of creativity he has given us.
I think the standard hymns should be used but not worn out. I think new =
ones should be used as well, but not exclusively. The musical challenge is =
to bring new life to the old standards and to play the new ones in a way =
that the congregation can grasp. These are challenges, to be sure. But =
they are challenges a good musician should gladly accept. And, as in most =
of life, the key is to find a workable balance.
I wholeheartedly agree that leadership sometimes involves prodding to get =
to a new, higher level. In music, this will, of course, include new hymns. =
But you can only prod so hard and for so long before it is just an =
annoying pain to the receiver who will then tune out the message. The =
leader has to approach this with cautious judgement and determine the =
right amount of force that will get the congregation moving, but not so =
much that they ask they resist.
In all, no one decides to become a church organist because it is easy.
Best regards,
Charlie
____________________________________________________________________
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Download free music by Clay Baker at:
http://www.frogmusic.com/JoyfulPostlude.html
To unsubscribe or set to vacation,
go to www.frogmusic.com/rodgersmem.html
If you have any difficulty with this or PayPal,
please contact noeljones@xxxxxxxxxxxxx for help!
- Follow-Ups:
- [rodgersorganusers] Re: A Thought About 'Pleasing Folks'
- From: Richard Torlai
Other related posts:
- » [rodgersorganusers] A Thought About 'Pleasing Folks'
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: A Thought About 'Pleasing Folks'
- » [rodgersorganusers] A Thought About 'Pleasing Folks'
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: A Thought About 'Pleasing Folks'
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: A Thought About 'Pleasing Folks'
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: A Thought About 'Pleasing Folks'
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: A Thought About 'Pleasing Folks'
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: A Thought About 'Pleasing Folks'
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: A Thought About 'Pleasing Folks'
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: A Thought About 'Pleasing Folks'
- » [rodgersorganusers] Re: A Thought About 'Pleasing Folks'
- [rodgersorganusers] Re: A Thought About 'Pleasing Folks'
- From: Richard Torlai