[rmaexpress_help] Re: maximum number of arrays
- From: "Lana Schaffer" <schaffer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rmaexpress_help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:54:47 -0800
Ben,
We set the buffer to minimum and the program worked!
Thanks,
Lana
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben Bolstad" <bmb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <rmaexpress_help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Lana Schaffer" <schaffer@xxxxxxxxxxx>; "Omeed Mirbod"
<omirbod@xxxxxxxx>; "Jun Ding" <junding@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 6:44 PM
Subject: [rmaexpress_help] Re: maximum number of arrays
I suggest that you keep your buffer settings (from the preference menu)
set to the minimum values. Unless you are running on a 64 bit linux
system you probably won't derive any additional benefit from having
higher settings and it may in fact hinder performance.
I recently ran a 353 array HG-U133 Plus 2.0 dataset on the windows build
with no problems (using the minimum settings).
Best,
Ben
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 15:21 -0500, Jun Ding wrote:
Hi Lana,
I have used RMAexpress to process ~180 arrays (also HGU133 Plus2.0) in
my desktop. The version I used was 0.4.1 Release. I don't know where
the problem is, but just want to let you know that it was perfectly
fine in my case.
Best,
Jun
----------------------------
Jun Ding, Ph.D. student
Department of Biostatistics
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI, 48105
----------------------------
Quoting Lana Schaffer <schaffer@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi,
> I am using RMAexpress v0.5alpha7 and found that I could process
> 120 arrays (HGU133 Plus2.0) but had a Runtime error when processing
> 150 arrays at the point of building the "Data Structures". The memory
> usage was not limiting and so it seems that an array was being
> over-written.
> Is my only choice remaining to install onto linux?
>
> Lana Schaffer
> Biostatistics/Informatics
> The Scripps Research Institute
> DNA Array Core Facility
> La Jolla, CA 92037
> (858) 784-2263
> (858) 784-2994
> schaffer@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
- References:
- [rmaexpress_help] maximum number of arrays
- From: Lana Schaffer
- [rmaexpress_help] Re: maximum number of arrays
- From: Jun Ding
- [rmaexpress_help] Re: maximum number of arrays
- From: Ben Bolstad
Other related posts:
- » [rmaexpress_help] maximum number of arrays
- » [rmaexpress_help] Re: maximum number of arrays
- » [rmaexpress_help] Re: maximum number of arrays
- » [rmaexpress_help] Re: maximum number of arrays
I suggest that you keep your buffer settings (from the preference menu) set to the minimum values. Unless you are running on a 64 bit linux system you probably won't derive any additional benefit from having higher settings and it may in fact hinder performance. I recently ran a 353 array HG-U133 Plus 2.0 dataset on the windows build with no problems (using the minimum settings). Best, Ben On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 15:21 -0500, Jun Ding wrote:
Hi Lana, I have used RMAexpress to process ~180 arrays (also HGU133 Plus2.0) in my desktop. The version I used was 0.4.1 Release. I don't know where the problem is, but just want to let you know that it was perfectly fine in my case. Best, Jun ---------------------------- Jun Ding, Ph.D. student Department of Biostatistics University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI, 48105 ---------------------------- Quoting Lana Schaffer <schaffer@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hi, > I am using RMAexpress v0.5alpha7 and found that I could process > 120 arrays (HGU133 Plus2.0) but had a Runtime error when processing > 150 arrays at the point of building the "Data Structures". The memory> usage was not limiting and so it seems that an array was being > over-written.> Is my only choice remaining to install onto linux? > > Lana Schaffer > Biostatistics/Informatics > The Scripps Research Institute > DNA Array Core Facility > La Jolla, CA 92037 > (858) 784-2263 > (858) 784-2994 > schaffer@xxxxxxxxxxx > > >
- [rmaexpress_help] maximum number of arrays
- From: Lana Schaffer
- [rmaexpress_help] Re: maximum number of arrays
- From: Jun Ding
- [rmaexpress_help] Re: maximum number of arrays
- From: Ben Bolstad