[rmaexpress_help] Batch effect produced when using RMA
- From: Jun Ding <junding@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rmaexpress_help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ben Bolstad <bmb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 19:08:31 -0500
Hi Dr. Bolstad,
I have a question regarding how to use RMA correctly.
We have data of 120 microarrays. But those 120 microarrays were not
done all together at one time. Actually, we collected 40 samples every
time and then went ahead to do microarrays on those 40 samples. So
basically we have 3 batches of microarrays (microarrays from the same
batch were done at the same time and there was a gap of several months
between two batches). I wonder in this case, when I use RMA, whether I
should analyze those 120 microarrays together or I should analyze each
batch of microarrays separately. I don't know the details of RMA, so I
really don't know which way I should take.
I have tried to use RMA to analyze each batch of microarrays separately
and then combined them together. I used PCA (principal component
analysis) to do an unsupervised analysis and what I found was that the
first principal component could perfectly separate three batches. I
guess that means there is an obvious batch effect in the data after RMA.
Look forward to getting your suggestions! Thanks a lot!
Jun
----------------------------
Jun Ding, Ph.D. student
Department of Biostatistics
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI, 48105
----------------------------
- Follow-Ups:
- [rmaexpress_help] Re: Batch effect produced when using RMA
- From: Ben Bolstad
Other related posts:
- » [rmaexpress_help] Batch effect produced when using RMA
- » [rmaexpress_help] Re: Batch effect produced when using RMA
- » [rmaexpress_help] Re: Batch effect produced when using RMA
- » [rmaexpress_help] Re: Batch effect produced when using RMA
- » [rmaexpress_help] Re: Batch effect produced when using RMA
- » [rmaexpress_help] Re: Batch effect produced when using RMA
- [rmaexpress_help] Re: Batch effect produced when using RMA
- From: Ben Bolstad