[riscos-printing] Re: Upgrading to a new printer

In article <5ba4585952.davehigton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
   Dave Higton <davehigton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In message <bffb1f5952.D_Lane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>           David R Lane <D_Lane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > (not BOOTS, the tax dodgers).

> I'm well aware this is OT, so I'll try to confine myself to one post.

> I read up on this story again today to remind myself what it was
> about.  My conclusion is that Boots have done nothing wrong:

> 1) The law of the land allows them to do what they did.

> 2) The directors are obliged to maximise the value to their
> shareholders; they would be in dereliction of their legal duty if
> they did not do so.

> So it's no use complaining about Boots, or boycotting Boots, or
> anything else in that vein.  Your beef is with the law of the
> land, and therefore, by extension, with the people who make the
> law of the land: our politicians.


which is why David Lane supports the Respect party.

-- 
From KT24 

Using a RISC OS computer running v5.16 

------------------------------------------------------------
    To change, suspend or cancel your subscription go to
       http://www.freelists.org/list/riscos-printing
------------------------------------------------------------

Other related posts: