[regional_school] Re: Letter to the editor
- From: Elizabeth Osta <elizabethosta@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: regional_school@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 09:50:08 -0500
Shawgi,
Jim Memmott and Mark Hare are both good, thorough writers. They'd love you.
I'm so glad you are who you are.
Elizabeth
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Shawgi Tell <stell5@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'd be happy to talk with any reporter anyone can put me in touch with.I'm
> also participating in other actions to oppose mayoral control, including
> broadening the discussion among people I know (colleagues and students),
> especially by arming them with facts about the negative experience in NYC,
> Chicago, and DC. Also, I will be one of two speakers at an upcoming forum
> opposing mayoral control. Details forthcoming.
>
> Shawgi Tell
> School of Education
> Nazareth College
> 389.2623
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Cahlil Cherubin
> To: 'regional_school@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> Sent: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 08:26:09 -0500 (EST)
> Subject: [regional_school] Re: Letter to the editor
>
>
> Has anyone been able to speak out on the local news? My friend is a
> reporter for Channel 8. Perhaps if there was some sort of meeting, he would
> be able to cover it.
>
> Cahlil
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> *From*: regional_school-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *To*: regional school
>
> *Sent*: Wed Mar 03 08:19:37 2010
> *Subject*: [regional_school] Re: Letter to the editor
>
>
>
> A number of college professors have written a letter. It is being vetted.
> Hopefully the participation will be robust.
>
>
>
> Bill
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Maeve Cullinane"
> To: "regional school"
> Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2010 8:12:20 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: [regional_school] Re: Letter to the editor
>
> It would have been nice if the D&C picked up on it and ran some
> investigative reporting. Maybe they will?
>
> I think there would be a lot of recognition and public notice of a letter
> or statement from College Professors and Education Depts coming out against
> mayoral control. It would be nice to hear from Principals and Teachers but I
> realize that's potentially risky for them.
>
>
>
>
> maeve
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mar 3, 2010, at 7:57 AM, William Cala wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> In today's D and C. the following letter appeared. Perhaps more poignant
> that the content (albeit significant) is the author of the letter.
>
>
>
> *Democrat and Chronicle*
>
> *3-3-10*
>
> *Don't follow the D.C. schools model*
>
> I do not seek to enter into the debate over Rochester Mayor Robert Duffy's
> effort to take over Rochester public schools. However, the Rochester Area
> Colleges, a consortium of Rochester public and private universities,
> colleges and community colleges, which supports the mayoral takeover, has
> used the mayoral takeover of Washington, D.C., public schools as a model
> of success. This is where I must speak out. Mayoral takeover of
> Washington, D.C., public schools has not proven to be highly successful.
> This group of presidents and others who support Mayor Duffy's plan do a
> great disservice to the people of Rochester if the Washington, D.C., model
> is used.
>
> —*ROBERT VINSON BRANNUM*
> WASHINGTON, D.C.
> The writer is president of the D.C. Federation of Civic Associations Inc.
>
>
>
>
>
> **************************************************************************************************
> The information in this communication, including all attachments transmitted
> with it, is
> confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the
> addressee. No
> confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If
> you are not the
>
> intended recipient, you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying,
> distributing or
> using any of this information. If you received this message in error, please
> contact the
>
> sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether
> electronic or hard
> copy. The sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions.
>
> This communication may contain nonpublic personal information about consumers,
> subject to the restrictions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. You may not
> directly or
> indirectly reuse or disclose such information for any purpose other than to
> provide the
> services for which you are receiving the information
>
> ***************************************************************************************************
>
>
>
--
Elizabeth Osta
Other related posts:
