I believe the 2006 date refers to the Original Memorandum Order not the subsequent action. R. E. (Dick) Driscoll, Sr. jose wrote: > well yah it started in 2006. wheels of Justas moving slow and all that jazz. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kelly Stanfield" <kstannfield@xxxxxxxxx> > To: <real-eyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2008 9:12 AM > Subject: [real-eyes] Re: Fw: [Missouri-l] Fw: [announce] Judge Robertson's > Order in ACB. v. U.S.Treasury Dept. > > > >> if I'm reading this correctly, this is dated 2006? >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Terrie Arnold" <tarnold2@xxxxxxxxx> >> To: <real-eyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 7:07 PM >> Subject: [real-eyes] Fw: [Missouri-l] Fw: [announce] Judge Robertson's >> Order >> in ACB. v. U.S.Treasury Dept. >> >> >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Terrie Arnold" <tanderson3@xxxxxxxxx> >>> To: "MCBL" <Missouri-l@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: "Chip Hailey" <chiphailey@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 6:37 PM >>> Subject: [Missouri-l] Fw: [announce] Judge Robertson's Order in ACB. v. >>> U.S.Treasury Dept. >>> >>> >>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "Melanie Brunson" <mbrunson@xxxxxxx> >>>> To: <leadership@xxxxxxx>; <announce@xxxxxxx>; <acb-l@xxxxxxx> >>>> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 4:32 PM >>>> Subject: [announce] Judge Robertson's Order in ACB. v. U.S. Treasury >>>> Dept. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hello all, >>>>> >>>>> We received a copy of Judge Robertson's order just a few minutes ago. >>>>> The text appears below my signature. There is an accompanying >>>>> memorandum which sets forth the judge's rationale which I will >>>>> circulate >>>>> as a separate message. >>>>> >>>>> Enjoy this! It will be a good excuse to party this weekend! >>>>> >>>>> Melanie Brunson >>>>> >>>>> Text of Order >>>>> >>>>> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT >>>>> FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA >>>>> >>>>> AMERICAN COUNCIL OF THE BLIND,: >>>>> et al., : >>>>> : >>>>> Plaintiffs, : >>>>> : Civil Action No. 02-0864 (JR) >>>>> v. : >>>>> : >>>>> HENRY M. PAULSON, JR., Secretary: >>>>> of the Treasury, : >>>>> : >>>>> Defendant. >>>>> >>>>> ORDER AND JUDGMENT >>>>> >>>>> The United States Court of Appeals for the District of >>>>> Columbia Circuit having affirmed this Court's Memorandum Order >>>>> (Amended) of December 1, 2006 [72]: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 1. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the defendant has violated Section >>>>> 504 of the Rehabilitation Act by failing to provide meaningful access >>>>> to >>>>> United States currency for blind and other visually impaired persons. >>>>> 2. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND DECREED that defendant take such steps as >>>>> may be required to provide meaningful access to United States currency >>>>> for blind and other visually impaired persons, which steps shall be >>>>> completed, in connection with each denomination of currency, not later >>>>> than the date when a redesign of that denomination is next approved by >>>>> the Secretary of the Treasury after the entry of this order and >>>>> judgment. >>>>> 3. This Order and Judgment does not apply to the one dollar ($1) note, >>>>> and does not require the defendant to make any changes to the one >>>>> dollar >>>>> ($1) note. This Order and Judgment does not apply to changing the >>>>> Series >>>>> year or the signatures of the Secretary of the Treasury or the >>>>> Treasurer >>>>> of the United States on each note, nor to changing the machine-readable >>>>> features on the notes that are not visible to the naked eye. >>>>> Notwithstanding paragraph 2 above, given that the defendant is >>>>> currently >>>>> engaged in implementing a redesign of the $100 note >>>>> ("the NextGen $100"), the defendant need not comply with paragraph 2 >>>>> above in connection with the NextGen $100 note until the date when >>>>> another redesign of such denomination is next approved by the Secretary >>>>> of the Treasury after the redesign that is currently in progress. >>>>> 4. The defendant shall file periodic status reports describing the >>>>> steps >>>>> taken to implement this Order and Judgment. The first such status >>>>> report shall be filed no later than March 16, 2009, and each succeeding >>>>> report shall be filed every six months thereafter, until the defendant >>>>> has fully complied with this Order and Judgment. >>>>> 5. The parties are directed to confer and attempt to reach agreement >>>>> regarding plaintiffs' claim for attorney's fees and costs. If no >>>>> agreement is reached, plaintiffs shall submit their application for >>>>> attorney's fees and costs within 60 days of the date of this Order and >>>>> Judgment. >>>>> >>>>> JAMES ROBERTSON >>>>> United States District Judge >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: announce-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: announce-help@xxxxxxx >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe from the Missouri-L list, send an email message to: >>>> Missouri-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>> with the word, unsubscribe in the subject field. >>>> >>>> Other email lists available from MCB include: >>>> ATI - A general discussion of adaptive technology. To join, send a >>>> blank >>>> EMail message to: >>>> ATI-Join@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>> Chat - A general discussion list. Just about anything goes. To Join, >>>> send a blank EMail message to: >>>> Chat-Join@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>> >>>> Visit the MCB home Page at: >>>> WWW.MoBlind.Org >>>> >>> To subscribe or to leave the list, or to set other subscription options, >>> go to www.freelists.org/list/real-eyes >>> >>> >>> >>> >> To subscribe or to leave the list, or to set other subscription options, >> go to www.freelists.org/list/real-eyes >> >> >> > > To subscribe or to leave the list, or to set other subscription options, go > to www.freelists.org/list/real-eyes > > > > To subscribe or to leave the list, or to set other subscription options, go to www.freelists.org/list/real-eyes