Hi Tom and All, Thank you for your explanations. Your idea of observing meteors at 20 MHz is very good, and I hope it will lead to a new and interesting RJ activity. Best regards, Victor On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Thomas Ashcraft <ashcraft@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > Hola Victor, Francisco, Ramon and all, > > First, I want to reiterate that when I am talking about the possibility of > receiving super-large fireballs on radiojove radios, I am talking about > receiving them directly. There is some confusion because most radio meteors > are observed using the forward scatter method which is different than what I > am writing about specifically here in this email. > > It would be very rare to capture a fireball directly at 20 MHz but it is > very common to receive meteors using the forward scatter method. > In the Spanish radio astronomy list, managed by Ramon Menendez, Francisco > has asked me: > > "Can meteors be detected using the data streams from: > Shane Observatory in British Columbia, Canada, at 98.7 MHz > TCWC Observatory in Almedia Pennsylvania, at 89.3 Mhz" > > -----Those observers are using the forward scatter method using reflections > of meteors off the beams of far-off FM radio transmitters. This method would > not apply to radiojove radios at 20 MHz. > > > "Where are Meteor events reported by North American and European Observers > ?" > > For news-making world fireballs see: > http://lunarmeteoritehunters.blogspot.com/ > > Fireball reports are also listed here although there is a time delay in the > logs: > http://www.amsmeteors.org/fireballs.html > http://www.amsmeteors.org/fireball/fireball_log2010.htm > > Note that fireballs large enough to even possibly be received *directly* at > 20 MHz happen only a few times a year over one location. If a large fireball > happens you will probably hear about it on your local news and thus can > check your radio charts. > > I hopes this helps. If not, I will try to explain further. :-) > > Best regards to all, > > Tom > > Thomas Ashcraft > New Mexico >