[racktables-users] Re: survey: barcodes versus asset tags
- From: Denis Ovsienko <pilot@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: racktables-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 18:18:05 +0400
> We store the in-house asset tag # in "asset tag" and the
> manufacturer's service tag/serial # in "barcode".
"OEM S/N 1" and "OEM S/N 2" would be a better place for such data,
wouldn't it? 0.17.2 will feature searching in the yellow attributes, if
that was the reason no to use them.
--
Denis Ovsienko
- References:
- [racktables-users] survey: barcodes versus asset tags
- From: Denis Ovsienko
- [racktables-users] Re: survey: barcodes versus asset tags
- From: Aaron Dummer
- [racktables-users] survey: barcodes versus asset tags
Other related posts:
- » [racktables-users] survey: barcodes versus asset tags - Denis Ovsienko
- » [racktables-users] Re: survey: barcodes versus asset tags - Winters, Jeremy
- » [racktables-users] Re: survey: barcodes versus asset tags - Frank Altpeter
- » [racktables-users] Re: survey: barcodes versus asset tags - Aaron Dummer
- » [racktables-users] Re: survey: barcodes versus asset tags - Panagiotis Christias
- » [racktables-users] Re: survey: barcodes versus asset tags - Denis Ovsienko
- » [racktables-users] Re: survey: barcodes versus asset tags - Killsystem
- » [racktables-users] Re: survey: barcodes versus asset tags - Ray Robertson
- » [racktables-users] Re: survey: barcodes versus asset tags - Curtis Brown
- » [racktables-users] Re: survey: barcodes versus asset tags - Andrew Milne
- » [racktables-users] Re: survey: barcodes versus asset tags - Andrew Milne
- » [racktables-users] Re: survey: barcodes versus asset tags - Michael Mansour