[racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server

On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Bill Jacqmein <wrjacqmein@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The base problem seems simple. a few more layers of abstraction should do.
>  Maybe being able to define that this 6u can contain upto 10 6ux1.9in units?
>
>  The differing orientations could be the showstopper.
>  I dont see a good way around that without creating generics and the
>  special templates when a new vendor shakes things up.

Does the orientations really matter to everyone.  While it would be
nice if it was an exact diagram of the physical rack I would suggest
that it would not be essential for the graphical diagram to be exact
to that level, surly just module numbers or something similar would be
enough to represent that data in a useful way.  Eg fast ethernet
module 1 is in bay 3:1.

Other related posts: