[racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server
- From: "Josh Kuo" <josh.kuo@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: racktables-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:08:00 -0700
I think it would be difficult to mimic all the blade servers out
there, since some blades go in vertically, while some fit in
horizontally, and when you get to switch modules you may even have
some modules that are bigger than some others, some have two per row,
some have 4 per row...
I'll find some pictures later and post them to the list to illustrate my point.
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Denis Ovsienko <pilot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > This sounds like a good work around for now, however are there any
> > plans to support servers as containers for virtual servers?
>
> I'd like to see a good representation for module switches and blade
> servers, if there is any.
>
> --
> DO4-UANIC
>
>
- Follow-Ups:
- [racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server
- From: Bill Jacqmein
- References:
- [racktables-users] Virtual Server
- From: Rudolph Bott
- [racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server
- From: Josh Kuo
- [racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server
- From: Robert Lazzurs
- [racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server
- From: Denis Ovsienko
Other related posts:
- » [racktables-users] Virtual Server
- » [racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server
- » [racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server
- » [racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server
- » [racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server
- » [racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server
- » [racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server
- » [racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server
- » [racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server
- [racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server
- From: Bill Jacqmein
- [racktables-users] Virtual Server
- From: Rudolph Bott
- [racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server
- From: Josh Kuo
- [racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server
- From: Robert Lazzurs
- [racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server
- From: Denis Ovsienko