[racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server
- From: Rudolph Bott <rb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: racktables-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 18:27:06 +0100
Josh Kuo wrote:
What I did was create a rack to represent a virtual machine (also for
blade servers), and each virtual machine becomes a rack-mounted unit
on the rack.
That doesn't sound bad at all..I might stick with this solution :)
However a statement from the developers about a roadmap would be nice!
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / with kind regards
Rudolph Bott
--
Megabit Informationstechnik GmbH
Karstr.25 41068 Moenchengladbach Tel:02161/30898-0 Fax:-18
AG MG HRB 10141, GF: Dipl.-Ing. Thomas Tillig, Michael Benten
- References:
- [racktables-users] Virtual Server
- From: Rudolph Bott
- [racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server
- From: Josh Kuo
Other related posts:
- » [racktables-users] Virtual Server
- » [racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server
- » [racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server
- » [racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server
- » [racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server
- » [racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server
- » [racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server
- » [racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server
- » [racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server
What I did was create a rack to represent a virtual machine (also for blade servers), and each virtual machine becomes a rack-mounted unit on the rack.
- [racktables-users] Virtual Server
- From: Rudolph Bott
- [racktables-users] Re: Virtual Server
- From: Josh Kuo