[racktables-users] Re: Question about NAT and Items showing up in Subnets

Perhaps it would make sense to create a firewall object that has the NAT
IP assigned?

 

From: racktables-users-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:racktables-users-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Carr
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 1:56 PM
To: racktables-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [racktables-users] Question about NAT and Items showing up in
Subnets

 

Hello, all.

 

I'm implanting our new RackTables system and am scratching my head on
something.  It appears that when I create an object like a server,
assign it an IP address (like 192.168.1.1) and then match a NAT IP
address to it (like 39.1.1.1), that IP address in the NAT subnet
(39.1.1.1) does not show up as being allocated.  If I edit that that
address, by drilling down into the IPV4 Space -> 39.1.1.1 I can see that
the NAT mapping is there, but that 39.1.1.1 address  won't show up as
being green when I look at the whole subnet.  Is that on purpose?

 

Thanks,

Tim

 

Tim Carr

Vice President, Information Technology and Consulting

tcarr@xxxxxxxxxxxx

(972) 910-7530 o

(214) 755-8990 c

 


  People | Process | Technology

          www.buchanan.com <http://www.buchanan.com/> 

 Celebrating 20 Years!

JPEG image

Other related posts: