[racktables-users] Re: %GPASS% and server model
- From: "Tyler J. Wagner" <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: racktables-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:43:58 +0000
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 15:37 +0100, Frank Altpeter wrote: > Big NACK :-) > > It has its sense and I find it useful. Seconded. I use GPASS and GSKIP and find them both very useful. If anything, this should be even MORE strongly typed. Hardware types should define a template of ports, RU height and depth, etc. When you assign a hardware type to an object, create the missing ports. But that's a major redesign away, essentially swapping the order of inheritance in objects. Regards, Tyler -- "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway. -- Andrew S. Tanenbaum
- Follow-Ups:
- [racktables-users] Re: %GPASS% and server model
- From: Mills, Matt
- [racktables-users] Re: %GPASS% and server model
- From: Wawrzyniec Niewodniczański
- [racktables-users] Re: %GPASS% and server model
- References:
- [racktables-users] %GPASS% and server model
- From: Wawrzyniec Niewodniczański
- [racktables-users] Re: %GPASS% and server model
- From: Frank Altpeter
- [racktables-users] %GPASS% and server model
Other related posts:
- » [racktables-users] %GPASS% and server model - Wawrzyniec Niewodniczański
- » [racktables-users] Re: %GPASS% and server model - Frank Altpeter
- » [racktables-users] Re: %GPASS% and server model - Tyler J. Wagner
- » [racktables-users] Re: %GPASS% and server model - Mills, Matt
- » [racktables-users] Re: %GPASS% and server model - Wawrzyniec Niewodniczański
- » [racktables-users] Re: %GPASS% and server model - Matt Shields