[racktables-users] Re: Adding 'reserved' status to a rack
- From: Brian Gallew <geek@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: racktables-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 07:59:31 +0300
Denis Ovsienko wrote:
If existing rackspace state diagram isn't going to change much (IOW, to
mount something onto reserved rackspace, one will first have to "free"
it up), implementing a new "R" state should be an easy hack. Are there
other people, who agree, that this extra complexity is necessary? I
don't have a clear opinion on this at the moment.
For my own purposes, if I had to reserve rack space, I'd just create a
42U blank and insert it into the rack. Or two 21U blanks. Or
whatever. Add appropriate device notes to say, "Reserved for customer
<X> expansion anticipated June '08" or something.
- Follow-Ups:
- [racktables-users] Re: Adding 'reserved' status to a rack
- From: Erik Weber
- References:
- [racktables-users] Adding 'reserved' status to a rack
- From: Erik Weber
- [racktables-users] Re: Adding 'reserved' status to a rack
- From: Denis Ovsienko
- [racktables-users] Re: Adding 'reserved' status to a rack
- From: Erik Weber
- [racktables-users] Re: Adding 'reserved' status to a rack
- From: Denis Ovsienko
Other related posts:
- » [racktables-users] Adding 'reserved' status to a rack
- » [racktables-users] Re: Adding 'reserved' status to a rack
- » [racktables-users] Re: Adding 'reserved' status to a rack
- » [racktables-users] Re: Adding 'reserved' status to a rack
- » [racktables-users] Re: Adding 'reserved' status to a rack
- » [racktables-users] Re: Adding 'reserved' status to a rack
- » [racktables-users] Re: Adding 'reserved' status to a rack
- » [racktables-users] Re: Adding 'reserved' status to a rack
- » [racktables-users] Re: Adding 'reserved' status to a rack
- » [racktables-users] Re: Adding 'reserved' status to a rack
If existing rackspace state diagram isn't going to change much (IOW, to mount something onto reserved rackspace, one will first have to "free" it up), implementing a new "R" state should be an easy hack. Are there other people, who agree, that this extra complexity is necessary? I don't have a clear opinion on this at the moment.
- [racktables-users] Re: Adding 'reserved' status to a rack
- From: Erik Weber
- [racktables-users] Adding 'reserved' status to a rack
- From: Erik Weber
- [racktables-users] Re: Adding 'reserved' status to a rack
- From: Denis Ovsienko
- [racktables-users] Re: Adding 'reserved' status to a rack
- From: Erik Weber
- [racktables-users] Re: Adding 'reserved' status to a rack
- From: Denis Ovsienko