[python] one stubborn guy
- From: olaf <noll@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: python@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 19:07:09 +0200
A friend of mine is quite convinced that negative trail always, in all
cases, is an evil thing. Negative trail is unstable and not providing
the bike good riding characteristics, he says. He has been presented
with the argument of the pendulum/gravity-theory that explains why the
python stabilises due to the riders weight. But he stubbornly keeps
shaking his head. He believe that the python design would benefit a lot
if one used a positive trail instead, like in other centre-steered
bikes. You will find his sketches here:
http://morpheo.anti.nu/python/python2_1.jpg
Now, what argument should I use to convince the guy he is wrong?
cheers,
olaf (who have started to build a 406 python)
============================================================
This is the Python Mailinglist at freelists.org
Listmaster: Juergen Mages jmages@xxxxxx
============================================================
- Follow-Ups:
- [python] Re: one stubborn guy
- From: Eduardo L P Jr
- [python] Re: one stubborn guy
- From: Jürgen Mages
- References:
- [python] Re: p3 almost finished
- From: jamera
Other related posts:
- » [python] one stubborn guy
- » [python] Re: one stubborn guy
- » [python] Re: one stubborn guy
- » [python] Re: one stubborn guy
- » [python] Re: one stubborn guy
- » [python] Re: one stubborn guy
- » [python] Re: one stubborn guy
- » [python] Re: one stubborn guy
- » [python] Re: one stubborn guy
- » [python] Re: one stubborn guy
cheers, olaf (who have started to build a 406 python)
- [python] Re: one stubborn guy
- From: Eduardo L P Jr
- [python] Re: one stubborn guy
- From: Jürgen Mages
- [python] Re: p3 almost finished
- From: jamera