[python] Re: flevo lowracer versus python
- From: Jürgen Mages <jmages@xxxxxx>
- To: python@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:11:15 +0100
Hello Thomas,
I attached a photo of Meindert's bike. Dennis has tried
several times to contact Meindert for more info, but
unfortunately, he had no success.
As far as one can judge from the photo I would definitely
call this bike an early version of the Python. I really
wonder about its history and its fate.
Cheers,
Jürgen.
On 20.02.2007 15:35, Thomas P Jahn wrote:
This is probably a question to Jürgen.
I am confused when browsing your python page.
What is the principle difference between your
python and the flevo lowracer from Meindert
Valenteijn from 1994? It is center-steered and
has a negative trail. And it is a lowracer. So
apart from the fact, that the python is assembled
from conventional bike part, which is a great
thing, isn't the flevo lowracer a python just as
any other from your servey?
This is probably a question to Jürgen. I am confused when browsing your python page.What is the principle difference between your python and the flevo lowracer from Meindert Valenteijn from 1994? It is center-steered and has a negative trail. And it is a lowracer. So apart from the fact, that the python is assembled
from conventional bike part, which is a greatthing, isn't the flevo lowracer a python just as any other from your servey?
- Follow-Ups:
- [python] Re: flevo lowracer versus python
- From: Ronald Hongsermeier
- [python] Svar: Re: flevo lowracer versus python
- From: Thomas Paul Jahn
- [python] Re: flevo lowracer versus python
- References:
- [python] flevo lowracer versus python
- From: Thomas P Jahn
- [python] flevo lowracer versus python
Other related posts:
- » [python] flevo lowracer versus python
- » [python] Re: flevo lowracer versus python
- » [python] Re: flevo lowracer versus python
- » [python] Re: flevo lowracer versus python
