[python] Re: Stability Theory (Was: rubber pivot)
- From: olaf <noll@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: python@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 22:46:25 +0100
On Saturday, February 5, 2005, at 08:07 PM, Jürgen Mages wrote:
Olaf,
this theory might be an eye opener.
Peter was the first to tell me, that the riders postion towards
the bike is possibly more important than the frame geometry.
Yes, there is a chance that in this type of bikes rider's position is
more crucial than on other bikes.
E.g. I am always stunned to see how much more stable P1 is
at high speed than P3, although the geometry is almost
identical.
Once I reached 70 km/h coasting downhill with P1.
Exactly the same hill I rode with P3 one year later and
had to start braking at 50 km/h, because I could not let it
go.
Perhaps you could compare your riding position on the two bikes by
taking photographs from the side.
Would it be possible for you to illustrate your idea with a
drawing or by comparing two different pictures?
Actually I could hardly find any pic that is shot exactly from the
side. I think this is necessary if the findings should be of any value.
Nevertheless I collected a few pics here:
http://www.liggcykel.se/pythonfolder/pythonangles.html
olaf
Regards from Jürgen.
Hi all,
Here is a vague theory on scientifically shaky grounds:
When comparing how difficult or easy different pythons are to ride we
usually compare angles and measures of the bike itself without
relating them to the rider. Important for the experience is perhaps
also where and how the rider is placed on the bike.
I have looked through python pictures taken from the side with rider
mounted. There aren't many, but enough to see that there are
differences in where the pivot is situated in respect to rider's >>
body.
When turning a python you use the lower part of your body, the
movement begins where the thigh bones connect to pelvis, the rest of
the upper body is static. The movement is circular and the centre of
this circle is in the middle of your body. Now if the bike doesn't
fold right below that centre it will become heavy and unstable to
execute this movement, increasingly so the further away from the
centre you get. You and the bike aren't aligned.
So perhaps, and here comes the theory, it is important for stability
and balance that the pivot is placed below the centre of leg movement
AND that the seat and pivot angle are aligned so when drawing a line
from the pivot showing the extension of the pivot angle, it should
continue upwards through the middle of the riders body.
olaf
============================================================
This is the Python Mailinglist at freelists.org
Listmaster: Juergen Mages jmages@xxxxxx
============================================================
============================================================
This is the Python Mailinglist at freelists.org
Listmaster: Juergen Mages jmages@xxxxxx
============================================================
- Follow-Ups:
- [python] Re: Stability Theory
- From: Jürgen Mages
- References:
- [python] Stability Theory (Was: rubber pivot)
- From: Jürgen Mages
Other related posts:
- » [python] Stability Theory (Was: rubber pivot)
- » [python] Re: Stability Theory (Was: rubber pivot)
- » [python] Re: Stability Theory (Was: rubber pivot)
On Saturday, February 5, 2005, at 08:07 PM, Jürgen Mages wrote:
Olaf,
this theory might be an eye opener. Peter was the first to tell me, that the riders postion towards the bike is possibly more important than the frame geometry.
E.g. I am always stunned to see how much more stable P1 is at high speed than P3, although the geometry is almost identical. Once I reached 70 km/h coasting downhill with P1. Exactly the same hill I rode with P3 one year later and had to start braking at 50 km/h, because I could not let it go.
Would it be possible for you to illustrate your idea with a drawing or by comparing two different pictures?
Regards from Jürgen.
Hi all,
Here is a vague theory on scientifically shaky grounds:
When comparing how difficult or easy different pythons are to ride we usually compare angles and measures of the bike itself without relating them to the rider. Important for the experience is perhaps also where and how the rider is placed on the bike.
I have looked through python pictures taken from the side with rider mounted. There aren't many, but enough to see that there are differences in where the pivot is situated in respect to rider's >> body.
When turning a python you use the lower part of your body, the movement begins where the thigh bones connect to pelvis, the rest of the upper body is static. The movement is circular and the centre of this circle is in the middle of your body. Now if the bike doesn't fold right below that centre it will become heavy and unstable to execute this movement, increasingly so the further away from the centre you get. You and the bike aren't aligned.
So perhaps, and here comes the theory, it is important for stability and balance that the pivot is placed below the centre of leg movement AND that the seat and pivot angle are aligned so when drawing a line from the pivot showing the extension of the pivot angle, it should continue upwards through the middle of the riders body.
olaf
============================================================
This is the Python Mailinglist at freelists.org
Listmaster: Juergen Mages jmages@xxxxxx
============================================================
============================================================
- [python] Re: Stability Theory
- From: Jürgen Mages
- [python] Stability Theory (Was: rubber pivot)
- From: Jürgen Mages