[python] Re: Climbing and test rides
- From: Dirk Bonne <dirk.bonne@xxxxxxx>
- To: python@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:22:39 +0200
25hz wrote:
The seat position of the python is similar to that on
high racer recumbents, so, as long as a functional BB to seat measurement is
maintained, has anyone come across any good reasons to have a low python
aside from possible aerodynamic advantages?
Well, uhmm climbing (less shifting of the weight to the back), less
slipping. cooler looks.
dirk
high racer recumbents, so, as long as a functional BB to seat measurement is
maintained, has anyone come across any good reasons to have a low python
aside from possible aerodynamic advantages?
- References:
- [python] Climbing
- From: Jürgen Mages
- [python] Re: Climbing and test rides
- From: 25hz
- [python] Climbing
Other related posts:
- » [python] Re: Climbing and test rides
- » [python] Re: Climbing and test rides
- » [python] Re: Climbing and test rides
- » [python] Re: Climbing and test rides
- » [python] Re: Climbing and test rides