>Yes, there is a difference. > > > > >Regards > > > >Ralph W. Lambrecht I am thinking that the roll film is designed so that under exposure is almost impossible, in order to be idiot-proof. In fact, they say that you can shoot it at ISOs up to 3200! So, when you shoot it at 400, of course the shadows are going to be placed a little high. --shannon > > > > > > > >On 2/23/05 3:39 AM, "Shannon Stoney" <sstoney@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> Well, that's definitive! ISO 160, 200, 250, 400, and 800. Yes, there >>> appears to be room for personal preference here... >>> >>> -Bill >> >> >> I forgot to mention: I was talking about the roll film. I wonder if >> there is a difference with sheet film? >> >> --shannon >> >>> >>> >>>============================================================================= >>> ================================ >>> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to >>> your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when >>> you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there. >> >> >>============================================================================== >> =============================== >> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your >> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you >>subscribed,) >> and unsubscribe from there. > > > >============================================================================================================= >To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to >your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when >you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there. ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.