[pure-silver] storing developer solutions (was Re: Re: HC 110 question ...)
- From: David Foy <dfoy@xxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 12:56:20 -0600
Winemaking stores sell high-barrier Mylar "bags" meant to hold home-made
wine. They're the same bags used in the bag-in-a-box "box wines."
I realize that no-one on this list has ever sunk to the depths of
drinking the kinds of wines that come in boxes, so I probably should
explain in considerable depth exactly what these are...
but what with the pressures of time etc etc, I must defer to another
day...also let me make it clear that *I* have had no personal experience
with these so-called "wines." Yuk.
These bags work exceptionally well. You can exclude all of the air, and
because they are a laminate of high-density polyester and metal foil,
their gas permeability is extremely low, much lower than any plastic
bottle with the possible exception of rigid PET. I base this statement
on what the manufacturers say about the laminate material, and what
bottle manufacturers say about PET and HDPE. It's all googleable for the
curious.
I store 5-litre quantities of my own Bluefire HR developer concentrate
in them between bottling runs. Longevity tests indicate zero loss of
activity in nearly two years (same with full, capped rigid PET bottles),
versus an insignificant yet measurable loss associated with full, capped
HDPE. I use them to store HC-110 stock for months at a time, and have
not yet seen any obvious oxygen problems.
They're very inexpensive, something like $4 for a 5-litre bag. They're
very easy to wash and re-use.
David Foy
Koch, Gerald wrote:
Bottles that are soft enough to squeeze may not be the best to use since
they may allow oxygen to diffuse into the contents. The accordian style
sold in photo stores are particularly bad in this respect. PET or PETE
bottles while more rigid and not really squeezable are probably a better
choice.
...
quoting someone: Which is why it goes in a bottle you can squeeze the air out
of to keep
it fresh(er).
...
...
who quoted someone else: The diluted stock solution has limited keeping
properties while the
concentrate is eternal. I forget Kodak's recomendation, 3
months for
partially filled bottles?
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [pure-silver] Re: storing developer solutions
- From: Ryuji Suzuki
- [pure-silver] Re: storing developer solutions (was Re: Re: HC 110 question ...)
- From: EJ Neilsen
- References:
- [pure-silver] Re: HC 110 question ...
- From: Koch, Gerald
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] storing developer solutions (was Re: Re: HC 110 question ...)
- » [pure-silver] Re: storing developer solutions (was Re: Re: HC 110 question ...)
Bottles that are soft enough to squeeze may not be the best to use since they may allow oxygen to diffuse into the contents. The accordian style sold in photo stores are particularly bad in this respect. PET or PETE bottles while more rigid and not really squeezable are probably a better choice.
quoting someone: Which is why it goes in a bottle you can squeeze the air out of to keep it fresh(er).
who quoted someone else: The diluted stock solution has limited keeping properties while the concentrate is eternal. I forget Kodak's recomendation, 3 months for partially filled bottles?
- [pure-silver] Re: storing developer solutions
- From: Ryuji Suzuki
- [pure-silver] Re: storing developer solutions (was Re: Re: HC 110 question ...)
- From: EJ Neilsen
- [pure-silver] Re: HC 110 question ...
- From: Koch, Gerald