[pure-silver] (slightly OT): Symmar versus Symmar-S

Hi,

since the list is a bit quit lately, I would like to ask the following 
(slightly OT): is there a noticable (ie in the final print) difference between 
a Schneider Symmar 210 (single-coated) versus a Schneider Symmar S 210 
(multicoated) under the following consitions: 4*5 B&W (FP4), subjest: a 
landscape on a sunny afternoon, sun in the back, shielding direct sunlight from 
the lens, printing on 30*40 cm.

I have "collected" 3 210 lenses thusfar: a 210 Symmar S 210 (mainly used during 
my rare studio sessions, too bulky to carry along a lot in the field), a 210 
G-Claron (tiny, f9, but only single coated, and has I discovered too late: has 
a haze on one of the elements which I cannot clean, affecting image quality 
probably, but I did not test it good enough, first images were ok but not 
brilliant) and recently a 210 Symmar, smaller than the SymmarS, faster than the 
G-Claron.

I will try to test these 3 lenses agianst each other when I find the time (will 
not be that soon), so I would like to hear about experiences people have with 
these lenses,

thanks,

Best,

Cor
============================================================================================================To
 unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account 
(the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and 
unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: