[pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- From: Claudio Bonavolta <claudio@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 09:27:00 +0200
----- Message d'origine -----
De: Jim Brick <jim@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 23:12:27 -0700
Sujet: [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
À: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>At 06:08 PM 5/21/2007 -0500, EJ Neilsen wrote:
>
>>P3 can be run in
>>a Jobo. You may be able to re plumb your CAP 40 to handle the P3, but I
>>don't think so.
>
>
>Yes, P3 runs faultlessly in my JOBO. It is very cost effective. A 3.5
>liter P-30 kit costs exactly the same as a 20 liter P3 kit. $150. B&H
>stocks P-30 but won't ship it.
>
>A 20 liter P3 kit will process 66 20x24 prints and costs $150. A
>sheet of 20x24 Cibachrome costs $14. So if you use up a 20 liter kit
>with 66 20x24's, the total is ~$1,075 or ~$16.25 per print. Which is
>cheaper than LightJet prints even including Ciba test strips. The
>cheapest 20x24 LightJet (from a good lab) is around $25. Plus the
>cost or agony of scanning your film.
>
>Jim
>
Normally, P-30 shouldn't exist anymore, it has been replaced by kit P3.5
(5-liters, all liquids):
http://www.ilford.com/html/us_english/v2/ilfochrome2.asp
Which should run in Jobo, CAP40 and ICP42.
Like the P30, mixing all waste solutions should neutralize them.
Price is on the P30 range, so if you have some volume to print, it's better to
go with the P3 chemistry.
Note that P3 solutions should be neutralized separately, don't mix them ! Done
that once, arrrrghh :-((
Claudio Bonavolta
http://www.bonavolta.ch
============================================================================================================To
unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account
(the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and
unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- From: Claudio Bonavolta
- [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- From: Jim Brick
- References:
- [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- From: Jim Brick
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] shamefully off topic
- » [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- » [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- » [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- » [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- » [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- » [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- » [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- » [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- » [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- » [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- » [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- » [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- » [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- » [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- » [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- » [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- » [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- » [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- » [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- » [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- » [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- » [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- » [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- » [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- » [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- » [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- From: Claudio Bonavolta
- [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- From: Jim Brick
- [pure-silver] Re: shamefully off topic
- From: Jim Brick