[pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- From: Shannon Stoney <sstoney@xxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 14:10:51 -0600
>
I'll try that. What do you mean by minimal agitation? My normal
agitation is 10 seconds once every 60 seconds, as per Ilford's
directions.
That's fine with LF. The minimal agitation is more important with 35mm and I
forgot that you are exclusively LF (aren't you?). I use 12-13 min for TX or
TMY and it come out fine but, DON'T REUSE IT. It has compensating effect at
this dilution so you will probably see no more blown highlights. The gamma
will be a bit lower but I think you'll like the tonal range.
Right now I'm processing some MF film: HP5+. I like a long scale.
The paper scale with the enlarger I use now, and my last few boxes of
Agfa paper, is about 1.3, I guess because of the diffusion head.
So for MF film, what would minimal agitation be?
--shannon
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- From: John Black
- [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- From: Richard Knoppow
- References:
- [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- From: Koch, Gerald
- [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- From: Shannon Stoney
- [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- From: John Black
- [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- From: Shannon Stoney
- [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- From: John Black
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
I'll try that. What do you mean by minimal agitation? My normal agitation is 10 seconds once every 60 seconds, as per Ilford's directions.
That's fine with LF. The minimal agitation is more important with 35mm and I forgot that you are exclusively LF (aren't you?). I use 12-13 min for TX or TMY and it come out fine but, DON'T REUSE IT. It has compensating effect at this dilution so you will probably see no more blown highlights. The gamma will be a bit lower but I think you'll like the tonal range.
============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
- [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- From: John Black
- [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- From: Richard Knoppow
- [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- From: Koch, Gerald
- [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- From: Shannon Stoney
- [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- From: John Black
- [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- From: Shannon Stoney
- [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- From: John Black