[pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- From: titrisol <titrisol@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 13:08:05 -0800 (PST)
After reading those instructions what I did was:
- Have at least 4 or 5 tankloads for 1 session (35mm + 120)
So I could develop 8-10 rolls in one night, kind of
marathonic actually but saved some money.
- Make 1l of 1+4 solution
- Use 600ml for 1 tankload
- Develop and return the 600ml to the 1 l
- Add 10% after the 2nd tank has been developed
Results are similar to one another.
BUT with LF films, wouldn't you need a lot less if using tubes??
in such case economy would become a secondary problem.
--- Richard Knoppow <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Shannon Stoney" <sstoney@xxxxxxx>
> To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 10:28 AM
> Subject: [pure-silver] re-using DDX
>
>
> >I was reading the DDX bottle today and noticed the
> >following:
> >
> > "For economy, DDX can be reused to process either a number
> > of films individually or multiple films in batches. If a
> > series of films is being developed in a spiral tank,
> > compensate for the loss of development activity after
> > developing the first film (or batch of films) by
> > increasing development time 10% for each successive batch.
> > This relies on the used developer...being poured back into
> > the working strength solution's storage bottle and mixed
> > with the fresh, unused part of the developer before
> > processing the next film/batch."
> >
> >
> > ??? I don't get it. Pour the used developer back into
> > some fresh working solution and then add 10% to your
> > times? But, how much fresh developer? And how does that
> > save any money if you need fresh developer to do it?
> >
> > --shannon
> >
> It is a bit indefinite.
> Most developers can be used for more than one roll or
> batch of film by extending time. Usually, there will be a
> loss of shadow detail because of the accumulation of
> reaction products. To a large degree this can be compensated
> for by replenishment. Older developers use a separate
> replenisher solution, some later developers are replenished
> by adding more developer. T-Max RS is an example of this
> type. I beleive Xtol can be replenished the same way.
> For simple replenishment the replenisher is added
> according to the area of film developed, the amount of
> developer being carried off by the film assumed to be enough
> so that the volume of the developer remains constant. This
> method works better than simply re-using developer, however,
> for consistency sensitometric tests must be made
> periodically. This last is how photofinishing machines and
> motion picture developing machines are operated. There is
> still a difference between fresh developer and replenished
> developer. In automatic machines a "developer starter" is
> used to condition fresh developer to minize the difference
> when new developer is being used. The starter adds what
> amounts to reaction products to the fresh developer. This
> method is simply too bothersome for low volume home
> darkrooms.
> You are right to be confused by Ilford's instructions
> since the effect on development time on re-use depends on
> the volume of used developer to the volume of fresh
> developer. For instance, a single 8 oz tankfull of used
> developer when added to 5 liters is likely to have
> insignificant effect.
> Ilford used to be pretty good at answering e-mail, it
> would be worth a few minutes writing to them for
> clarification.
>
> ---
> Richard Knoppow
> Los Angeles, CA, USA
> dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
=============================================================================================================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and
> logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password
> you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- References:
- [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- From: Richard Knoppow
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- » [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- [pure-silver] Re: re-using DDX
- From: Richard Knoppow