>I'm interested in some general feed-back on this software, since I gave it a >try about 8 years ago with questionable success (Davies gave me the Mac >software, but it didn't work for me). I ended up having much better results >by plotting and extrapolating by hand or using simple computer graphics >programs. The theory behind it seemed close enough, but the execution lacked >accuracy. After I modified a few things, it worked well. > >Can you share other experiences? I know several people who use it with a lot of success. They love it. These are mostly people who shoot really big sheet film for alt processes. I think I am going to keep trying it for a while before I give up. I could have made a mistake when I exposed the film under the enlarger light, or messed up the developer somehow. Or maybe I am metering wrong, or my light meter is screwed up. It's kind of old and needs adjustment about once a year. But, the four minute times just don't seem right. That makes me think I made a mistake in the test somehow. SBR means subject brightness range in Phil-speak. --shannon ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.