[pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- From: "tOM Trottier" <tOM@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 20:40:59 -0400
On Sunday, December 31, 2006 at 19:16,
Speedy . <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
...
> -- The problem of the longivity of the image has not been solved in
> the digital imaging realm. Hard drives crash, CD-r's go bad or get
> scratched, and file formats change. Even if you have a readable
> disk ten years from now there is no guarantee that you will have
> hardware that can read the disk or software that is backwards
> compatable enough to interpret and display it...
...
So print pigment copies on acid-free paper.
tOM
-- Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur --
,__@ tOM Trottier
_-\_<, 758 Albert St., Ottawa ON Canada K1R 7V8
(*)/'(*) N45.41235 W75.71345 +1 613 860-6633
<a href="http://Abacurial.com">Abacurial Information Architecture</a>
Q, Q,
</ </ This world, after all our science and sciences, is still
(`-/---/-') a miracle; wonderful, inscrutable, magical and more,
~~@~~~~@~~~~~~ to whosoever will think of it. --Thomas Carlyle
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- References:
- [pure-silver] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- From: Dana H. Myers
- [pure-silver] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- From: Speedy .
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- » [pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- [pure-silver] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- From: Dana H. Myers
- [pure-silver] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial
- From: Speedy .