[pure-silver] Re: [lens] Re: Film vs Digital- was: Amusing Kodak commercial

Well, pigment ink jet prints are already far more permanent than our chemical 
colour photos, and 
perhaps even more long-lived than our silver prints and negatives. Besides, 
it's such a hassle 
doing separations....

Happy New Year, tOM


On Sunday, December 31, 2006 at 12:48,
afterswift@xxxxxxx <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrot

> Long before I bought a digital camera, I was scanning film prints
> and distributing those image files on the Net. And had a solid
> negative record to boot. There is no excuse for not using film
> cameras digitally and B&W processing for permanence.
> 
> Bob 


-- Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur --
   ,__@         tOM Trottier
 _-\_<,         758 Albert St., Ottawa ON Canada  K1R 7V8
(*)/'(*)        N45.41235 W75.71345     +1 613 860-6633
<a href="http://Abacurial.com";>Abacurial Information Architecture</a>
     Q,  Q,
    </  </      This world, after all our science and sciences, is still 
 (`-/---/-')            a miracle; wonderful, inscrutable, magical and more, 
~~@~~~~@~~~~~~  to whosoever will think of it. --Thomas Carlyle



=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) 
and unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: