[pure-silver] Re: development times for 24 vs 36 exposures
- From: DarkroomMagic <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: PureSilverNew <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 17:41:50 +0200
I have never done a test on this, but I wouldn't bother. The difference
cannot be too great. Having said that, When I do development calibrations
for sheet films, I always develop 4 sheets to have an average number. The
resulting development time is used for 2, 4, and 6 sheets. Never had a
problem with this system.
Regards
Ralph W. Lambrecht
On 2005-04-28 03:11, "Shannon Stoney" <sstoney@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Should you change your development times for roll film when
> you switch, say, from 36 exposures to 24? It seems that you then
> have more developer per negative, but maybe that doesn't make any
> difference.
>
> --shannon
> ==============================================================================
> ===============================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
> and unsubscribe from there.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- References:
- [pure-silver] development times for 24 vs 36 exposures
- From: Shannon Stoney
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] development times for 24 vs 36 exposures
- » [pure-silver] Re: development times for 24 vs 36 exposures
- » [pure-silver] Re: development times for 24 vs 36 exposures
- » [pure-silver] Re: development times for 24 vs 36 exposures
- » [pure-silver] Re: development times for 24 vs 36 exposures
- [pure-silver] development times for 24 vs 36 exposures
- From: Shannon Stoney