[pure-silver] Re: development times for 24 vs 36 exposures
- From: Sauerwald Mark <mark_sauerwald@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 18:21:14 -0700 (PDT)
Shannon
Most developers have plenty of active ingredients so
they do not appreciably exhaust themselves during
development, so the development time stays the same.
I imagine that for some of the really dilute
developers, you might have an issue, but I have never
bothered changing the amount of developer, or time for
differing amounts of film.
Mark
--- Shannon Stoney <sstoney@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Should you change your development times for roll
> film when
> you switch, say, from 36 exposures to 24? It seems
> that you then
> have more developer per negative, but maybe that
> doesn't make any
> difference.
>
> --shannon
>
=============================================================================================================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to
> www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the
> same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [pure-silver] Re: development times for 24 vs 36 exposures
- From: Richard Knoppow
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] development times for 24 vs 36 exposures
- » [pure-silver] Re: development times for 24 vs 36 exposures
- » [pure-silver] Re: development times for 24 vs 36 exposures
- » [pure-silver] Re: development times for 24 vs 36 exposures
- » [pure-silver] Re: development times for 24 vs 36 exposures
- [pure-silver] Re: development times for 24 vs 36 exposures
- From: Richard Knoppow