Bob My data is on its way to you via private email. Regards Ralph W. Lambrecht http://www.darkroomagic.com On 2006-09-23 05:01, "rgacpa@xxxxxxxxxxx" <rgacpa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thank you for this vote of support (I think that's what it was, yes?) Mr. > Brick! I'll take it any way I can get it :-) > But you knew that... > boB > > Bob Adler > Palo Alto, CA > http://www.raflexions.com > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Jim Brick <jim@xxxxxxxxx> > To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 5:08:41 PM > Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Zone Data Project > > At 08:15 PM 9/22/2006 +0200, Ralph W. Lambrecht wrote: > >> Bob >> >> For a link to my site, you can have my data, but I predict that you¹ll have a >> lot of conflicting data. How do you intend to deal with that? >> >> Ralph W. Lambrecht > > > > Ralph, > > You have to understand boB's job. He works in county government as, I believe, > assistant controller. He works with numbers for at least 50% of each day, the > numbers being of dubious origin. Which leaves 50% of each day to chat on > email, peruse photo e-lists, etc. I can't think of a better project for boB > than attempting to compile and correlate zone data from a dozen or so people. > And, as you know Ralph, everyone has their own idea of what constitutes the > different zone tones (gray card exposures and densitometer readings) vs. real > world zone placement. > > I believe only boB is capable of ginning up a spread sheet that can, somehow, > correlate data of dubious origin. Heck... it's his job! AND... it will give > much of us relief from boB's idle time e-mail barrage as he will be busy > massaging dubious data. Luckily, I don't live in boB's county... ;-) > > Everyone send their data to boB. I already have. > > All kidding aside, this could be very interesting. > > :-) > > Jim > >