[pure-silver] Re: Why does B&W Film Scan so poorly
- From: "Jim MacKenzie" <jim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:37:28 -0600
----- Original Message -----
From: "titrisol" <titrisol@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 9:36 AM
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Why does B&W Film Scan so poorly
> It does indeed,
> It has to do with the fact that BW film is a collection of
> "grains" of silver instead of dyes (like c41 film)
This to me is the negative of chromogenic films. They scan better, but
because they use dyes they can't be archival.
Jim
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- References:
- [pure-silver] Re: Why does B&W Film Scan so poorly
- From: titrisol
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] Why does B&W Film Scan so poorly
- » [pure-silver] Re: Why does B&W Film Scan so poorly
- » [pure-silver] Re: Why does B&W Film Scan so poorly
- » [pure-silver] Re: Why does B&W Film Scan so poorly
- » [pure-silver] Re: Why does B&W Film Scan so poorly
- » [pure-silver] Re: Why does B&W Film Scan so poorly
- » [pure-silver] Re: Why does B&W Film Scan so poorly
- » [pure-silver] Re: Why does B&W Film Scan so poorly
- » [pure-silver] Re: Why does B&W Film Scan so poorly
- » [pure-silver] Re: Why does B&W Film Scan so poorly
- » [pure-silver] Re: Why does B&W Film Scan so poorly
- » [pure-silver] Re: Why does B&W Film Scan so poorly
- » [pure-silver] Re: Why does B&W Film Scan so poorly
- [pure-silver] Re: Why does B&W Film Scan so poorly
- From: titrisol