[pure-silver] Re: Was Ilford -- Sulfide toners?
- From: Peter Badcock <peter.badcock@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:37:40 +1000
On 10/26/05, Peter De Smidt <pdesmidt@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Here's what I do:
> Since I want the increased black density that selenium offers, along
> with minimal tonal shift; I tone Ilford FB MG first in selenium 1+9 for
> 4 minutes. Rinse. Then I tone in Kodak brown toner, followed by a bath
> in sodium sulfite, which minimizes/prevents staining. There's a slight
> split tone which is nice. The prints should be very well protected.
Peter, do you have any examples of prints that you have toned in this
manner?
thanks
Peter
- References:
- [pure-silver] Re: Was Ilford -- Sulfide toners?
- From: DarkroomMagic
- [pure-silver] Re: Was Ilford -- Sulfide toners?
- From: Philippe Gauthier
- [pure-silver] Re: Was Ilford -- Sulfide toners?
- From: Peter De Smidt
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] Was Ilford -- Sulfide toners?
- » [pure-silver] Re: Was Ilford -- Sulfide toners?
- » [pure-silver] Re: Was Ilford -- Sulfide toners?
- » [pure-silver] Re: Was Ilford -- Sulfide toners?
- » [pure-silver] Re: Was Ilford -- Sulfide toners?
- » [pure-silver] Re: Was Ilford -- Sulfide toners?
- » [pure-silver] Re: Was Ilford -- Sulfide toners?
- » [pure-silver] Re: Was Ilford -- Sulfide toners?
- » [pure-silver] Re: Was Ilford -- Sulfide toners?
- » [pure-silver] Re: Was Ilford -- Sulfide toners?
- » [pure-silver] Re: Was Ilford -- Sulfide toners?
- » [pure-silver] Re: Was Ilford -- Sulfide toners?
- [pure-silver] Re: Was Ilford -- Sulfide toners?
- From: DarkroomMagic
- [pure-silver] Re: Was Ilford -- Sulfide toners?
- From: Philippe Gauthier
- [pure-silver] Re: Was Ilford -- Sulfide toners?
- From: Peter De Smidt