[pure-silver] Re: Uneasy Question From Nervous Uncle

I've been thinking about exactly that since this thread gathered steam. 
I wonder if Uncle Dick would have to consider that fact that his 
friends, acting as models, did indeed confer some "valuable 
consideration" in the form of their time and faces/bodies (or whatever 
Uncle was shooting). Since a professional model would be paid cash, is 
it reasonable to assume that the modeling services of *any* individual, 
professional or not, have value? If so, that might tip the equation, 
rock the boat, pie the type, or shake the martini. Or maybe not...

-Bill


On Saturday, January 29, 2005, at 02:03  PM, Dave Hornford wrote:

> I leave it as an exercise to determine the meaning of 'published' in
> Australian law - like 'valuable consideration' it is a legal term that
> when used as such doesn't necessarily mean what reasonable
> English-speaking adults think it means.

=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) 
and unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: