[pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:21:38 -0700
----- Original Message -----
From: "jeffrey" <puresilver@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 12:34 PM
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
Well, I gave it a shot - Rodinal 1:100 for 30 min. at
about 72 deg. Strong agitation for the first 30-40 sec.,
then let it sit.
Most of the frames turned out OK (if a bit thinner than
expected), but a few frames (with wide expanses of clear
sky) showed sprocket-hole streaks. Not pronounced, but
enough to ruin the frame. Seemed inconsistant thru the
roll.
Not sure what to think.
The sprocket hole streaks are typical of stagnant
development. There is some convection of the reaction
products of development when the film is vertical in the
bath. Since there is no development going on at the sprocket
holes there are not reaction products produced so there will
be an area under them that is somewhat higher in density
than in the adjacent spaces. The effect is present all over
the film but may not be noticable where there are not small,
well defined, areas of significantly high or low density.
You will find the opposite adjacent to small, dense
highlights, where there will be streaks of lower development
due to bromide.
Generally stagnant or stand development is done with the
film horizontal. The reaction products accumulate in the
vicinity of the development then and the effect is of
lowered density of highlights and exagerated adjacency
effects, which are controlled by diffusion in the emulsion.
Stand development can be useful for some special effects
but IMO is not good general practice. Frankly, I think Danny
was lucky.
Nonetheless, the pictures are excellent.
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- From: Gene Johnson
- References:
- [pure-silver] Stand developing
- From: Danny Twang
- [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- From: jeffrey
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] Stand developing
- » [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- » [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- » [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- » [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- » [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- » [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- » [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- » [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- » [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- » [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- » [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- » [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- » [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- » [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- » [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- » [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- » [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- » [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- » [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- » [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- » [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- » [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- » [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- » [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- » [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- » [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
Most of the frames turned out OK (if a bit thinner than expected), but a few frames (with wide expanses of clear sky) showed sprocket-hole streaks. Not pronounced, but enough to ruin the frame. Seemed inconsistant thru the roll.
Not sure what to think.
- [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- From: Gene Johnson
- [pure-silver] Stand developing
- From: Danny Twang
- [pure-silver] Re: Stand developing
- From: jeffrey