[pure-silver] Re: Semi OT copyright
- From: Anne & Charles Ellis <cgellis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 09:03:49 -0500
Thanks to all who commented on this. Now I have to get off my this and
that and make some prints.
Charles E.
Dave Hornford wrote:
Charles,
Look at the US copyright office website for information on copyrights. The
relevant legislation has been updated at least once in the US since 1966 and
at least one of the pieces of legislation retroactively changed the
copyright law.
You need to look carefully because of the date & the medium. The relevant
legislation may be different for photographs taken then than now. Also, it
is common for photographs to have copyright protections that are less than
other mediums.
Dave
(snip)
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- References:
- [pure-silver] Re: Semi OT copyright
- From: Dave Hornford
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] Semi OT copyright
- » [pure-silver] Re: Semi OT copyright
- » [pure-silver] Re: Semi OT copyright
- » [pure-silver] Re: Semi OT copyright
- » [pure-silver] Re: Semi OT copyright
- » [pure-silver] Re: Semi OT copyright
Charles,
Look at the US copyright office website for information on copyrights. The relevant legislation has been updated at least once in the US since 1966 and at least one of the pieces of legislation retroactively changed the copyright law.
You need to look carefully because of the date & the medium. The relevant legislation may be different for photographs taken then than now. Also, it is common for photographs to have copyright protections that are less than other mediums.
Dave
(snip)
- [pure-silver] Re: Semi OT copyright
- From: Dave Hornford