[pure-silver] Re: PureSilver was good, but...
- From: HowardDvorin@xxxxxx
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:34:15 EDT
The two are very different. For one thing APUG accepts advertising and has
broader topics.. There is a niche for each. It isn't a one or the other
chioce.
Howard Dvorin
Mt. Laurel, NJ USA
In a message dated 8/24/06 4:37:51 PM Mid-Atlantic Daylight Time,
info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> ..is it over?
>
> There are very few messages per week here now. I keep looking, but there is
> close to no activity compared to other sites. I always appreciated the more
> advanced discussions here and have learned a lot from you all.
>
> What happened? Why is the APUG membership growing by over 100 a month (and
> sometime a week)?
>
> BTW:
>
> Richard
>
> They really need you on APUG.
>
>
>
- Follow-Ups:
- [pure-silver] Re: PureSilver was good, but...
- From: Bogdan Karasek
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] PureSilver was good, but...
- » [pure-silver] Re: PureSilver was good, but...
- » [pure-silver] Re: PureSilver was good, but...
- » [pure-silver] Re: PureSilver was good, but...
- » [pure-silver] Re: PureSilver was good, but...
- » [pure-silver] Re: PureSilver was good, but...
- » [pure-silver] Re: PureSilver was good, but...
- [pure-silver] Re: PureSilver was good, but...
- From: Bogdan Karasek