[pure-silver] Re: Preferred Studio Camera
- From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:41:18 -0800
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ralph W. Lambrecht" <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "PureSilverNew" <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 11:38 AM
Subject: [pure-silver] Preferred Studio Camera
OK, I'll start.
What is your preferred negative format for portrait work
and why?
Have you used a large-format camera for portraits or would
you consider it?
Regards
Ralph W. Lambrecht
http://www.darkroomagic.com
I don't do much studio work but like to do portraits.
These are often outdoor or what used to be called candid.
I've used all formats from 35mm to 8x10 (with the exception
of 5x7). I find my style stays remarkably the same. I may be
one of the few who can shoot snapshots with an 8x10:-)
I used to prefer a Rolleiflex or Rolleicord but my lack
of ability focus my eyes makes it difficult to shift from
subject to finder, so I work mostly with a Nikon 35mm SLR. I
don't have a larger SLR other than a 4x5 Graflex or I would
probably use it. I see a definite difference in detail and
tone rendition between 35mm and anything larger. BTW, I have
the same problem with the Graflex as I do with the Rolleis,
namely having to shift glasses on and off when using it. I
have a diopter corrector for the Nikon finder which
eliminates this.
View cameras are good where pictures are planned and the
subject stays still.
I find that for the most part negatives larger than 4x5
don't offer much improvement, at least for prints up to
maybe 16x20.
BTW, Recently I have been using T-Max 100 developed in
full strength Ilford Perceptol for 35mm. The tone rendition
is considerably improved I think due to the very fine grain.
I shoot the combination at about EI-50 and negatives are
normal contrast. The grain is nearly as fine as I used to
get with Technical Pan but without the tone distortion from
the extended red sensitivity and the very slow speed and
finicky contast control. Kodak Microdol-X is virtually
identical to Perceptol.
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- References:
- [pure-silver] Preferred Studio Camera
- From: Ralph W. Lambrecht
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] Preferred Studio Camera
- » [pure-silver] Re: Preferred Studio Camera
- » [pure-silver] Re: Preferred Studio Camera
- » [pure-silver] Re: Preferred Studio Camera
- » [pure-silver] Re: Preferred Studio Camera
- » [pure-silver] Re: Preferred Studio Camera
OK, I'll start.What is your preferred negative format for portrait work and why? Have you used a large-format camera for portraits or would you consider it?
Regards Ralph W. Lambrecht http://www.darkroomagic.com
- [pure-silver] Preferred Studio Camera
- From: Ralph W. Lambrecht