[pure-silver] Re: Pre-Exposure of Negatives
- From: Aaron Reece <oboeaaron@xxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 05:27:22 -0400
I have a pre-exposure device made from two squares of white plastic.
They are taped together, with spacers between the sheets, which
leaves a slot inside for 4" neutral density filters. I use 0.3, 0.6,
and 1.2 neutral density filters with it. This is handy not just
because I can meter through the device (with no filter installed) and
quickly pre-expose the film anywhere from 1 to 7 stops below the
reading by placing the correct filter or filters in the slot, but
also because getting the correct low-value pre-exposure can be
difficult in bright light without the ND filters. In practice I find
that pre-exposure to a Zone II value is the most effective setting,
but of course your scene, equipment, procedure, and personal taste
will determine this for you.
If you plan to use this technique with a roll-film camera, you will
need to choose a model with multiple-exposure capability.
I find the pre-exposure technique a quick, simple, and effective way
to boost the shadows for an individual frame or sheet of film, and
much more controllable and reliable than so-called "compensating"
developers and development methods. I am always surprised that more
black-and-white photographers do not take advantage of such a simple
method.
Best regards,
Aaron
On Jul 17, 2006, at 8:31 PM, Jim Brick wrote:
I've been doing this for years. But I use a piece of white frosted
acetate. I mounted it in a filter holder so it is easy to put on
the lens.
- Follow-Ups:
- [pure-silver] Shameless Self-promotion
- From: Don Feinberg
- References:
- [pure-silver] Pre-Exposure of Negatives
- From: Ralph W. Lambrecht
- [pure-silver] Re: Pre-Exposure of Negatives
- From: Frank Filippone
- [pure-silver] Re: Pre-Exposure of Negatives
- From: Jim Brick
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] Pre-Exposure of Negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: Pre-Exposure of Negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: Pre-Exposure of Negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: Pre-Exposure of Negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: Pre-Exposure of Negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: Pre-Exposure of Negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: Pre-Exposure of Negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: Pre-Exposure of Negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: Pre-Exposure of Negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: Pre-Exposure of Negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: Pre-Exposure of Negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: Pre-Exposure of Negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: Pre-Exposure of Negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: Pre-Exposure of Negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: Pre-Exposure of Negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: Pre-Exposure of Negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: Pre-Exposure of Negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: Pre-Exposure of Negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: Pre-Exposure of Negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: Pre-Exposure of Negatives
On Jul 17, 2006, at 8:31 PM, Jim Brick wrote:
- [pure-silver] Shameless Self-promotion
- From: Don Feinberg
- [pure-silver] Pre-Exposure of Negatives
- From: Ralph W. Lambrecht
- [pure-silver] Re: Pre-Exposure of Negatives
- From: Frank Filippone
- [pure-silver] Re: Pre-Exposure of Negatives
- From: Jim Brick