[pure-silver] Re: Photo 101
- From: "Ben R. McRee" <ben.mcree@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 12:32:28 -0400
Although I was taught to make contact sheets in the manner I
originally described (with the clear areas of the film just barely
visible), I must admit that Jonathan's reasoning makes more sense.
Time to reform.
I do find contact sheets extremely useful, and it would never enter
my mind not to make one, even when the urge to get straight to
printing a newly developed roll of film tempts me to skip it.
--Ben
On Sep 26, 2008, at 1:59 PM, mail1 wrote:
I consider the clear ends and edge of the film as base plus fog,
and when
proofing I print this as black. If the edge is visible I consider
the proof
sheet under exposed, and this will provide misleading information to
determine if the film has been properly exposed or developed. If
the shadow
detail is too dark the film may be under exposed. If the high light
are gray
the film might be under developed, and if the high lights are
washed out the
film may be over developed. I am speaking in very general terms
here because
a change in paper grade changes this relationship. Also the Subject
Brightness Ratio of the original scene plays a big role here.
Jonathan Ayers [mail1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
-----Original Message-----
From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dr. Benjamin
R. McRee
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 6:42 AM
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Photo 101
Justin,
I've always found that a properly exposed contact sheet (printed so
that the
clear base at the ends and edges is just visible) helps a great deal.
--Ben
----- Original Message -----
From: "Justin F. Knotzke" <jknotzke@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 9:30:28 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada
Eastern
Subject: [pure-silver] Photo 101
I am in the process of souping rolls of film, 120, shot while in
Yosemite
park. So lots of pine and rock.. I bracketed all of the shots and
used a red
filter for many of them.. I've got a big weekend of printing ahead
of me and
I want to waste as little time as possible as I have 10 prints to
produce.
How do you go about evaluating your negs ? How do you chose
which of your
bracketed shots to go ahead and print ? Looking at the negs, they
go from
thinner to thicker. The thickest shots are the ones were I can make
out most
of the elements in the image. But is that the best frame to print ?
Just curious as to what people do when trying to decide which
frame to
print.. Obviously test prints is the best way, but there still
needs to be a
narrowing of possibilities..
Thanks
J
====================================To unsubscribe from this list,
go to
www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail
address and
password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.7.2/1690 - Release Date:
9/25/2008
7:05 AM
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.7.2/1690 - Release Date:
9/25/2008
7:05 AM
======================================================================
======================================To unsubscribe from this
list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-
mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and
unsubscribe from there.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- References:
- [pure-silver] Photo 101
- From: Justin F. Knotzke
- [pure-silver] Re: Photo 101
- From: Dr. Benjamin R. McRee
- [pure-silver] Re: Photo 101
- From: mail1
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] Photo 101
- » [pure-silver] Re: Photo 101
- » [pure-silver] Re: Photo 101
- » [pure-silver] Re: Photo 101
- » [pure-silver] Re: Photo 101
- » [pure-silver] Re: Photo 101
sheet under exposed, and this will provide misleading information todetermine if the film has been properly exposed or developed. If the shadow detail is too dark the film may be under exposed. If the high light are gray the film might be under developed, and if the high lights are washed out the film may be over developed. I am speaking in very general terms here because
a change in paper grade changes this relationship. Also the Subject Brightness Ratio of the original scene plays a big role here. Jonathan Ayers [mail1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] -----Original Message----- From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx[mailto:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dr. Benjamin R. McRee
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 6:42 AM To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Photo 101 Justin,I've always found that a properly exposed contact sheet (printed so that the
clear base at the ends and edges is just visible) helps a great deal. --Ben ----- Original Message ----- From: "Justin F. Knotzke" <jknotzke@xxxxxxxxxx> To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxSent: Friday, September 26, 2008 9:30:28 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [pure-silver] Photo 101I am in the process of souping rolls of film, 120, shot while in Yosemite park. So lots of pine and rock.. I bracketed all of the shots and used a red filter for many of them.. I've got a big weekend of printing ahead of me and I want to waste as little time as possible as I have 10 prints to produce.
How do you go about evaluating your negs ? How do you chose which of your bracketed shots to go ahead and print ? Looking at the negs, they go from thinner to thicker. The thickest shots are the ones were I can make out most
of the elements in the image. But is that the best frame to print ?Just curious as to what people do when trying to decide which frame to print.. Obviously test prints is the best way, but there still needs to be a
narrowing of possibilities.. Thanks J====================================To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and
password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there. No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG.Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.7.2/1690 - Release Date: 9/25/2008
7:05 AM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG.Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.7.2/1690 - Release Date: 9/25/2008
7:05 AM====================================================================== ======================================To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e- mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
- [pure-silver] Photo 101
- From: Justin F. Knotzke
- [pure-silver] Re: Photo 101
- From: Dr. Benjamin R. McRee
- [pure-silver] Re: Photo 101
- From: mail1