[pure-silver] Re: Optical question
- From: "Mike Kirwan" <mkirwan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:23:42 -0800
Depends on where you place the acrylic. If before the negative no change in
focus. If after the negative, i.e. the negative resting on the acrylic them
you will alter the distance from the negative to the lens and you will need
to refocus. If after the lens - no change.
If you are putting before or after the negative make sure it is clean and
dust free - else they will be enlarged as well.
Hope this helps
Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter De Smidt
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 5:00 PM
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [pure-silver] Optical question
Suppose one were to put a piece of 5mm thick acrylic between a negative
and an enlarging lens. Would the piece of acrylic cause the distance
needed to focus the negative at a given size to change? If so, would
there need to be more or less extension between the negative and the lens?
============================================================================
=================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- References:
- [pure-silver] Diafine
- From: Bogdan Karasek
- [pure-silver] Re: Diafine
- From: Craig Schroeder
- [pure-silver] Old paper andDefendre 58-D
- From: C.Breukel
- [pure-silver] Re: Old paper andDefendre 58-D
- From: Richard Knoppow
- [pure-silver] Re: Old paper andDefendre 58-D
- From: Don Sweet
- [pure-silver] Re: Old paper andDefendre 58-D
- From: Richard Knoppow
- [pure-silver] Re: Old paper and Defender 58-D
- From: C.Breukel
- [pure-silver] Optical question
- From: Peter De Smidt
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] Optical question
- » [pure-silver] Re: Optical question
- » [pure-silver] Re: Optical question
- » [pure-silver] Re: Optical question
- » [pure-silver] Re: Optical question
- » [pure-silver] Re: Optical question
- » [pure-silver] Re: Optical question
- [pure-silver] Diafine
- From: Bogdan Karasek
- [pure-silver] Re: Diafine
- From: Craig Schroeder
- [pure-silver] Old paper andDefendre 58-D
- From: C.Breukel
- [pure-silver] Re: Old paper andDefendre 58-D
- From: Richard Knoppow
- [pure-silver] Re: Old paper andDefendre 58-D
- From: Don Sweet
- [pure-silver] Re: Old paper andDefendre 58-D
- From: Richard Knoppow
- [pure-silver] Re: Old paper and Defender 58-D
- From: C.Breukel
- [pure-silver] Optical question
- From: Peter De Smidt