[pure-silver] Re: Old portrait technique?
- From: Ray Rogers <earthsoda@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:24:23 -0700 (PDT)
Very definately a portrait style called "Vignetting".
These were at one time so common they might have been called the "hallmark" of
the professional studio photographer.
I still use the technique in nearly everything I print.
Perhaphs you know the technique as "dodging"
My flu does allow me to go for an award winning defination, but I would say in
general "Vignetting" is dodging in an oval or circular shape; there are many
variations so dont get too hung up on the shape
Ray
--- On Mon, 7/28/08, Michael Healy <emjayhealy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Michael Healy <emjayhealy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [pure-silver] Old portrait technique?
> To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Monday, July 28, 2008, 3:26 AM
> I've been scanning a boatload of ancient prints the past
> two years, most ranging from as
> recently as 1950 as far back as about 1885. A few have
> shown a phenomenon that
> puzzles me. I'm wondering whether anyone on the list is
> familiar with this.
>
> Every one of the images in question is a formal studio
> portrait. These date (I'm
> guessing) from the 1930s and the 1940s. (I'm stabbing
> at this, and/but the subjects
> either are known relatives or were related to people I can
> ID). The odd thing is that all of
> the prints have been blacked out (faded blackout) at about
> or below the knees. Initially I
> supposed that I was looking at print deterioration; but
> after encountering a good half-
> dozen of these, I have begun to think that photographers
> were deliberately raising or
> dropping one of the standards so the image would
> "softly" or "gradually" fade/cut off
> the
> portrait for a sort of softened or faded look.
>
> It's hard to isolate the examples as to time and place.
> A bunch of them come from the
> collection of my partner's father, who is
> Japanese-American but was raised in Japan
> before and during the war. So his photos include portraits
> shot in occupation-era Japan.
> But some also include portraits of his father and brother,
> shot in at least one studio in
> California's Central Valley, where my partner's
> Japanese grandfather was operating a
> farm before the arrests that followed Pearl Harbor. Also,
> I've come across a couple of
> these in photographs I recently inherited from my own
> father - photos shot in studios in
> Springfield, Illinois in the 1930s.
>
> As I said, I thought at first that these were instances of
> deterioration; but the
> deterioration I've encountered tends to involve fading.
> Even where it involves silvering,
> there already must have been heavy black to begin with. So
> was this a portrait style, or
> should I be viewing this as some kind of print
> deterioration? If so, what does it signify?
>
> Sorry, I don't have a webpage where I can post
> examples.
>
> Mike Healy
> =============================================================================================================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and
> logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password
> you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [pure-silver] Re: Old portrait technique?
- From: Ray Rogers
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] Old portrait technique?
- » [pure-silver] Re: Old portrait technique?
- » [pure-silver] Re: Old portrait technique?
- » [pure-silver] Re: Old portrait technique?
- » [pure-silver] Re: Old portrait technique?
- [pure-silver] Re: Old portrait technique?
- From: Ray Rogers