[pure-silver] Re: Mystery lines?
- From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 21:44:48 -0700
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeffrey Thorns" <puresilver@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 7:31 PM
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Mystery lines?
Agitation was continuous and vigorous throughout
development and fix - about 100 seconds for dev, 60 for
fix. (RC paper). Both developer and fix were mixed fresh
right before use.
I'll try it again tomorrow with twice as much developer
and the same neg. If the problem disappears, I'll know not
to be so tight-fisted with the dev in the future.
Marginal developer also occurs to me as the probable
cause. Do the trays have any sort of grooves or high areas
in them? If so, these can cause a localized increase in
development. Also, its possible that there are standing
waves unless the agitation pattern is random.
I could also be something else of course.
Usually, the development time necessary for maximum
density increases as the developer becomes exhausted. While
100 seconds should be enough for RC paper when the developer
is relatively fresh, it might not be enough if the stuff is
spent. Also, there is some loss of developer volume as one
works. Some is carried off with each print. This also
suggests that the marks may be caused by some structural
feature of the trays.
Another thought, the minimum development time for RC
will depend on whether it has incroporated developer. I
don't think any of the Ilford papers do. Incorporated
developer is mainly to allow the use of the paper in
rapid-access machines that use an activator rather than a
complete developer. When used in standard developer the
developer activates the developing agent as well as
developing with its own agents. The result is usually that
the prints come up fast and complete development in a short
time. Also, the capacity of the developer is increased. Some
DI papers will develop in as little as 45 seconds although
60 seconds is usually recommended. Non-DI papers will take
from 90 to 120 seconds for complete development.
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [pure-silver] Re: Mystery lines?
- From: C.Breukel
- [pure-silver] Re: Mystery lines?
- From: Jeffrey Thorns
- References:
- [pure-silver] Re: Mystery lines?
- From: Mark Blackwell
- [pure-silver] Re: Mystery lines?
- From: Jeffrey Thorns
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] Mystery lines?
- » [pure-silver] Re: Mystery lines?
- » [pure-silver] Re: Mystery lines?
- » [pure-silver] Re: Mystery lines?
- » [pure-silver] Re: Mystery lines?
- » [pure-silver] Re: Mystery lines?
- » [pure-silver] Re: Mystery lines?
- » [pure-silver] Re: Mystery lines?
- » [pure-silver] Re: Mystery lines?
- » [pure-silver] Re: Mystery lines?
- » [pure-silver] Re: Mystery lines?
- » [pure-silver] Re: Mystery lines?
- » [pure-silver] Re: Mystery lines?
I'll try it again tomorrow with twice as much developer and the same neg. If the problem disappears, I'll know not to be so tight-fisted with the dev in the future.
- [pure-silver] Re: Mystery lines?
- From: C.Breukel
- [pure-silver] Re: Mystery lines?
- From: Jeffrey Thorns
- [pure-silver] Re: Mystery lines?
- From: Mark Blackwell
- [pure-silver] Re: Mystery lines?
- From: Jeffrey Thorns