[pure-silver] Re: Multiple storage venues, multiple owners of our prints
- From: Jeffrey Thorns <puresilver@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:56:59 -0800
To me, this emphasizes the idea that I should be shooting for myself,
first and foremost. The simple fact is that I am unlikely to achieve
fame and fortune via my photography, so I had better be happy just
making pictures for myself.
(The gallery owners simply fail to see my brilliance!)
At 02:09 PM 12/28/2006 , Bob wrote:
Hi Lloyd,
... most museums will look at any photographer's body of work if it
is presented well. Let's ask ourselves what the curator is looking
for.
...
December 29, 2006, from Lloyd Erlick,
That's an interesting comment. I think I need to communicate with
curators more.
However, I have attempted to do so in the past. I figured I'd try to
give (give! donate gift) some of my work to local institutions that
would be appropriate for my work, such as the Toronto Archive. A
very nice man talked to me. He certainly came across professionally,
and clearly understood my desire. He said the archive would accept
material such as my portrait photographs in print form, as long as
the subjects were celebrities!
Other local (tax supported) institutions like the Art Gallery of
Ontario and the Royal Ontario Museum were uninterested.
None of these were concerned about how the presentation looked. They
did not care to look.
Commercial galleries (such as the Stephen Bulger Gallery here in
Toronto) are not interested in my prints because portraits don't
sell well to third parties.
<snip>
Interesting discussion we can't find anywhere else on the Net.
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: lloyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 8:38 AM
Subject: [pure-silver] Multiple storage venues, multiple owners of
our prints ...was Amusing Kodak commercial
Shouldn't we be exchanging packages of our work for the purpose of
archiving each others' prints, on a 'just in case' basis?
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [pure-silver] Multiple storage venues, multiple owners of our prints ...was Amusing Kodak commercial
- From: Lloyd Erlick
- [pure-silver] Re: Amusing Kodak commercial
- From: Janet Cull
- [pure-silver] Amusing Kodak commercial
- From: joe mcguckin
- [pure-silver] Re: Amusing Kodak commercial
- From: Stein
- [pure-silver] Re: Amusing Kodak commercial
- From: Dana H. Myers
- [pure-silver] Re: Amusing Kodak commercial
- From: Stein
- [pure-silver] Re: Amusing Kodak commercial
- From: Dana H. Myers
- [pure-silver] Re: Amusing Kodak commercial
- From: Stein
- [pure-silver] Re: Multiple storage venues, multiple owners of our prints
- From: Lloyd Erlick
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] Re: Multiple storage venues, multiple owners of our prints
- » [pure-silver] Re: Multiple storage venues, multiple owners of our prints
- » [pure-silver] Re: Multiple storage venues, multiple owners of our prints
- » [pure-silver] Re: Multiple storage venues, multiple owners of our prints
- » [pure-silver] Re: Multiple storage venues, multiple owners of our prints
At 02:09 PM 12/28/2006 , Bob wrote:
Hi Lloyd,... most museums will look at any photographer's body of work if it is presented well. Let's ask ourselves what the curator is looking for.
... December 29, 2006, from Lloyd Erlick,That's an interesting comment. I think I need to communicate with curators more.
However, I have attempted to do so in the past. I figured I'd try to give (give! donate gift) some of my work to local institutions that would be appropriate for my work, such as the Toronto Archive. A very nice man talked to me. He certainly came across professionally, and clearly understood my desire. He said the archive would accept material such as my portrait photographs in print form, as long as the subjects were celebrities!
Other local (tax supported) institutions like the Art Gallery of Ontario and the Royal Ontario Museum were uninterested.
None of these were concerned about how the presentation looked. They did not care to look.
Commercial galleries (such as the Stephen Bulger Gallery here in Toronto) are not interested in my prints because portraits don't sell well to third parties.
<snip>
Interesting discussion we can't find anywhere else on the Net. Bob -----Original Message----- From: lloyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 8:38 AMSubject: [pure-silver] Multiple storage venues, multiple owners of our prints ...was Amusing Kodak commercialShouldn't we be exchanging packages of our work for the purpose of archiving each others' prints, on a 'just in case' basis?
- [pure-silver] Multiple storage venues, multiple owners of our prints ...was Amusing Kodak commercial
- From: Lloyd Erlick
- [pure-silver] Re: Amusing Kodak commercial
- From: Janet Cull
- [pure-silver] Amusing Kodak commercial
- From: joe mcguckin
- [pure-silver] Re: Amusing Kodak commercial
- From: Stein
- [pure-silver] Re: Amusing Kodak commercial
- From: Dana H. Myers
- [pure-silver] Re: Amusing Kodak commercial
- From: Stein
- [pure-silver] Re: Amusing Kodak commercial
- From: Dana H. Myers
- [pure-silver] Re: Amusing Kodak commercial
- From: Stein
- [pure-silver] Re: Multiple storage venues, multiple owners of our prints
- From: Lloyd Erlick