[pure-silver] Re: Modern Day Prejudice
- From: "Dana H. Myers" <dana.myers@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 10:22:03 -0700
Harry Lock wrote:
Apparently the minimum
requirement is 48 megabytes and above. None of their digital SLR's can
do this straight out of the camera. I am very quick to point out that a
scan of a neg from my 1970's Hasselblad easily meets the requirement.
Even scans from my 1950s Minolta Autocord easily meet the requirement.
I admit I take pleasure in mentioning that I routinely shoot 80MP images
to digital-only friends and watching their draws drop.
Just the other day, I scanned some 10-year old 35mm APX25 negs and
was once again reminded how much I liked that film, even if the scans
were "only" 21MP (and not coming close to out-doing the film).
Dana
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [pure-silver] Re: Modern Day Prejudice
- From: Bob Adler
- References:
- [pure-silver] Modern Day Prejudice (was Cheap Thrill for the Women)
- From: Adrienne Moumin
- [pure-silver] Re: Modern Day Prejudice
- From: Harry Lock
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] Re: Modern Day Prejudice
- » [pure-silver] Re: Modern Day Prejudice
- » [pure-silver] Re: Modern Day Prejudice
- » [pure-silver] Re: Modern Day Prejudice
- » [pure-silver] Re: Modern Day Prejudice
- » [pure-silver] Re: Modern Day Prejudice
- [pure-silver] Re: Modern Day Prejudice
- From: Bob Adler
- [pure-silver] Modern Day Prejudice (was Cheap Thrill for the Women)
- From: Adrienne Moumin
- [pure-silver] Re: Modern Day Prejudice
- From: Harry Lock