[pure-silver] Re: Matrix Metering and Calibrating
- From: "Rob Champagne" <psps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 18:48:39 +0100
Over developing will give excessive contrast. i.e. requires soft filter for
printing.
Over exposure will give generally too light throughout the scene. i.e. dense
negatives but can be printed through(longer print time) to give reasonable
results at normal grade.
Street photography will often involve quick action on your part to capture
something that is happening. That often means there is not time to meter for
shadows and set aperture and shutter accordingly. Therefore, whilst zone
system is great for some applications it is not necessarily suitable for street
photography.
Ralph's calibration routines are fine BUT they only take into account one
"subject brightness range" which may or may not be correct for your typical
subject.
A typical landscape with sky and dark shadows may be need a 10 zone system but
a typical street scene with no sky may only need a 7 zone system so some trial
and error and/or testing for different brightness ranges will be needed by you
and this again depends on how you want your results to look.
Given that you have matrix metering I would suggest that you start by just
bracketing( normal, -1 stop, -2 stops ) some typical scenes and then making an
adjustment to film speed for the film you are using based on the results you
get. i.e if you find that the -1 stop images are the best then increase your
film speed setting by 1 stop.
Then if those best images are not contrasty enough, give 30% extra development
and bracket again or if too contrasty reduce dev by 30% and bracket again.
Repeat process a second time to fine tune it.
It is important to remember that no single development time is going to be
correct for all subject brightness ranges and zone system accuracy is only
achievable where time allows correct metering and development is altered to
suit subject brightness range.
Another method for the most consistent results across different subjects in
street photography I would use an incident meter.
Since most street scenes will either be lit by sky light or direct sun light
taking a single incident reading (pointing meter at main light source) and
manually setting that exposure and using it for all shots while the lighting
doesn't change will also give you consistent results. Again try this approach
and bracket and adjust dev accordingly. This method has the benefit of high
speed in that once exposure is set you only need to take note of lighting
changes which on a sunny or overcast day don't change much. On broken cloud
days then lighting may change frequently.
rob
At 12/09/2004 15:27 -0400, you wrote:
><quote who=Rob Champagne date=[040912 14:52]/>
>> And what is it that you don't like about the way they come out.
>> i.e. to much contrast, too little contrast, over exposed, under exposed.
>
> They are overexposed for the most part. I just don't know if I am
>overexposing in the camera or overdeveloping. I was hoping there was a method
>in which I could take a controlled shot using controlled methods to test if my
>current setup is correct.
>
> Is there not a way to calibrate a system?
>
>> are you printing them on silver gealtin or scanning them for digital prints.
>
> I do silver prints and I scan for the web. I never print from the scan. I'm
>not concerned with the scanning. I just want to make sure I am starting off
>with the best possible negative.
>
> Thanks.
>
> J
>
>--
>Justin F. Knotzke
>jknotzke@xxxxxxxxxx
>http://www.shampoo.ca
>=============================================================================================================
>To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
>account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
>and unsubscribe from there.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [pure-silver] Re: Matrix Metering and Calibrating
- From: DarkroomMagic
- References:
- [pure-silver] Re: Matrix Metering and Calibrating
- From: Rob Champagne
- [pure-silver] Re: Matrix Metering and Calibrating
- From: Rob Champagne
- [pure-silver] Matrix Metering and Calibrating
- From: Justin F. Knotzke
- [pure-silver] Re: Matrix Metering and Calibrating
- From: Justin F. Knotzke
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] Matrix Metering and Calibrating
- » [pure-silver] Re: Matrix Metering and Calibrating
- » [pure-silver] Re: Matrix Metering and Calibrating
- » [pure-silver] Re: Matrix Metering and Calibrating
- » [pure-silver] Re: Matrix Metering and Calibrating
- » [pure-silver] Re: Matrix Metering and Calibrating
- » [pure-silver] Re: Matrix Metering and Calibrating
- » [pure-silver] Re: Matrix Metering and Calibrating
- » [pure-silver] Re: Matrix Metering and Calibrating
- » [pure-silver] Re: Matrix Metering and Calibrating
- » [pure-silver] Re: Matrix Metering and Calibrating
- [pure-silver] Re: Matrix Metering and Calibrating
- From: DarkroomMagic
- [pure-silver] Re: Matrix Metering and Calibrating
- From: Rob Champagne
- [pure-silver] Re: Matrix Metering and Calibrating
- From: Rob Champagne
- [pure-silver] Matrix Metering and Calibrating
- From: Justin F. Knotzke
- [pure-silver] Re: Matrix Metering and Calibrating
- From: Justin F. Knotzke