[pure-silver] Re: Light source vignette or hopefully avoiding it
- From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:44:46 -0700
----- Original Message -----
From: "Frank Filippone" <red735i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 3:36 PM
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Light source vignette or
hopefully avoiding it
What Richard said......
Frank Filippone
red735i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Is there any way to figure this out?
Could I draw the cone of light the image forms? Using the
formulas for focus
to define the triangles? That makes sense doesn't it? It's
then a simple math
problem. At least if I looking at the problem correctly.
Nick
The angle of interest is the angle between the lens and
the film. You can calculate this from the formula for lens
to film focus distance. This distance should be the maximum
you think you will ever use since that is the narrowest
angle. By plotting a triangle with the lens as the apex and
the film as the base you can measure the angle graphically
or, for that matter, find the place where the distance
across the triangle (forgot the term) is the opening in the
enlarger. You can measure the equivalent distances from the
lens to this aperture and from the aperture to the film from
the graph. One can do this trigenometrically also from the
tangent of the angle.
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- References:
- [pure-silver] Re: Light source vignette or hopefully avoiding it
- From: Frank Filippone
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] Light source vignette or hopefully avoiding it
- » [pure-silver] Re: Light source vignette or hopefully avoiding it
- » [pure-silver] Re: Light source vignette or hopefully avoiding it
- » [pure-silver] Re: Light source vignette or hopefully avoiding it
- » [pure-silver] Re: Light source vignette or hopefully avoiding it
- » [pure-silver] Re: Light source vignette or hopefully avoiding it
- » [pure-silver] Re: Light source vignette or hopefully avoiding it
- » [pure-silver] Re: Light source vignette or hopefully avoiding it
- » [pure-silver] Re: Light source vignette or hopefully avoiding it
- » [pure-silver] Re: Light source vignette or hopefully avoiding it
- » [pure-silver] Re: Light source vignette or hopefully avoiding it
- » [pure-silver] Re: Light source vignette or hopefully avoiding it
- » [pure-silver] Re: Light source vignette or hopefully avoiding it
- » [pure-silver] Re: Light source vignette or hopefully avoiding it
- » [pure-silver] Re: Light source vignette or hopefully avoiding it
- » [pure-silver] Re: Light source vignette or hopefully avoiding it
- » [pure-silver] Re: Light source vignette or hopefully avoiding it
- » [pure-silver] Re: Light source vignette or hopefully avoiding it
What Richard said......
Frank Filippone red735i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Is there any way to figure this out?
Could I draw the cone of light the image forms? Using the formulas for focus
to define the triangles? That makes sense doesn't it? It's then a simple math
problem. At least if I looking at the problem correctly.
Nick
- [pure-silver] Re: Light source vignette or hopefully avoiding it
- From: Frank Filippone