[pure-silver] Re: Lens quality, filter degradation
- From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:49:42 -0800
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Hamming" <Scott.Hamming@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 1:24 PM
Subject: [pure-silver] Lens quality, filter degradation
> Hi all,
>
> Recently on a photo website, likely APUG or photo.net - I
> don't recall =
> which, a poster made the declaration that placing filters
> on a 'high =
> quality' lens (in this case the reference was Rolleiflex
> Planars and =
> Xenotars) degraded the optics to the level of the filter,
> and thereby =
> nullifying the need for a 'quality' lens. The last point
> is clearly an =
> overstatement, esp. considering the source, but I was
> curious as to what =
> the actual facts might be. It seems there may be several
> factors to =
> consider, such as coatings and glass quality, but are
> there other =
> considerations, and what degree of impact might they have?
> As for =
> myself, I always use a lens hood when possible and more
> often than not a =
> yellow Hoya multi-coated filter when shooting. Thanks,
>
> Scott
>
I think this may be due to a misunderstanding about an
optical principal. A plane parallel block of glass can
introduce some aberrations (spherical and chromatic) in an
image forming beam of light _providing_ the light rays are
passing through at an angle. Where the light is also
parallel the glass has no effect. Now, this assumes the
glass, or other substance, is homogenic and clear. When used
on the front of a lens focused on a distant object the light
from the object is essentially parallel so the filter will
have little effect. If the filter is made of good quality
optical glass, which is homogenious and with highly parallel
sufaces the glass itself will not have much effect on the
light. Some flare can be created by the glass-air sufaces if
not coated.
When a filter is used behind a lens the light is
convergent so the filter can degrade the lens performance.
For this reason behind the lens filters, when used, are
generally of gelatin. Gelatin has the advantage over glass
and plastics of having a very low index of refraction and
being very uniform and thin. The effects of the plane
parallel surface depend on its ratio of index to air and to
its thickness so the closer the index is to air and the
thinner it is the better.
To make it concise, the effect of a high quality, coated,
filter on the front of a lens, when used for normal
photography (not super close ups), is almost nil.
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- References:
- [pure-silver] Lens quality, filter degradation
- From: Scott Hamming
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] Lens quality, filter degradation
- » [pure-silver] Re: Lens quality, filter degradation
- » [pure-silver] Re: Lens quality, filter degradation
- » [pure-silver] Re: Lens quality, filter degradation
- [pure-silver] Lens quality, filter degradation
- From: Scott Hamming